irrigation · Yield · Pyrus communis (pear)
41 claims from these papers; 8 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
8 citations between these papers: 4 on the same side, 4 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 12
The Effects of Regulated Water Deficits on Pear Tree Growth, Flowering, Fruit Growth, and Yield · 1984
- positive
- positive
Modern water management in pear orchards [Pyrus communis L.] · 2006
- positive
- positive
- positive
EFFECT OF IRRIGATION RATE AND HUMIC ACID ON "LE-CONTE" PEAR · 2007
- positive
- negative
- negative
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of root pruning and irrigation regimes on pear tree: growth, yield and yield components · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
EFFECT OF ROOT PRUNING AND IRRIGATION ON GROWTH, WATER RELATIONS AND GAS EXCHANGE IN PEAR TREES · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 11
- negative
Effect of Microsprinkler Irrigation on Pear Fruit Growth and Postharvest Quality · 2001
- no effect
(214) Adult Pear Response to Integrated Nitrogen Fertigation and Drip Irrigation System · 2006
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- negative
Effects of different irrigation methods and quantity on yield and water use efficiency in pear · 2007
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
Deficit Irrigation as a Tool to Optimize Fruit Quality in Abbé Fetél Pear · 2021
- no effect
- negative
74. Variable rate irrigation based on UAV imagery and real-time sensor data in pear orchards · 2021
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.