Paper · 2008 · Acta Horticulturae

GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR OF 'DOYENNÉ DU COMICE' PEAR TREES GROWN ON TWO ROOTSTOCKS AND TWO WATER REGIMES

C.L. Giacobbo; J.C. Fachinello; R. Massai; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of rootstocks and water supply on growth and productive behavior of pear trees were evaluated during the growing season of 2003. The experiment was carried out in the experimental area of the Dipartimento di Coltivazione and Difese Delle Specie Legnose, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, Italy. Nine-year old trees of the cv. Doyenne Du Comice were used, grafted either on pear (Pyrus communis) or quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) rootstocks and grown under two different water regimes, irrigated or non-irrigated. The fruit growth curves, water xylematic potential, trunk diameter fluctuation, leaf temperature, gaseous exchanges, soil moisture content and estimated yield were analysed during the fruit growing period. The fruit development presented a standard simple sigmoidal curve. Irrigated trees produced larger fruits, where the most significant period was the final fruit growth stage. Irrigation also induced greater fluctuation of the trunk diameter and low leaf temperature, even after 35 days of water removal. Trees grafted on irrigated quince rootstocks exhibited higher gaseous exchanges, as well as estimated yields. The results indicated that water stress can influence the growth and productive characteristics of pear trees. The quince rootstocks showed more sensitivity to water stress than Pyrus ssp. rootstocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear fruit followed a simple sigmoidal growth curve.

Taxon
PEAR TREESPyrus communist0
Outcome
fruit development presented a standard simple sigmoidal curvee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit development presented a standard simple sigmoidal curve.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated pear trees produced larger fruits.

Taxon
PEAR TREESPyrus communist0
Organ / stage
final fruit growth stagee0
Treatment
Irrigatede0
Outcome
fruitse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
non-irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigated trees produced larger fruits, where the most significant period was the final fruit growth stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigated or non-irrigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased trunk diameter fluctuation.

Taxon
PEAR TREESPyrus communist0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
fluctuation of the trunk diametere0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
even after 35 days of water removale0
Comparator
non-irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation also induced greater fluctuation of the trunk diameter and low leaf temperature, even after 35 days of water removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigated or non-irrigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation lowered leaf temperature even after 35 days of water removal.

Taxon
PEAR TREESPyrus communist0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf temperaturee0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
even after 35 days of water removale0
Comparator
non-irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation also induced greater fluctuation of the trunk diameter and low leaf temperature, even after 35 days of water removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigated or non-irrigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees on irrigated quince rootstocks had higher gaseous exchanges.

Taxon
PEAR TREESPyrus communist0
Treatment
irrigated quince rootstockse0
Outcome
gaseous exchangese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees grafted on irrigated quince rootstocks exhibited higher gaseous exchanges, as well as estimated yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafted either on pear (Pyrus communis) or quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) rootstocks and grown under two different water regimes, irrigated or non-irrigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees on irrigated quince rootstocks had higher estimated yields.

Taxon
PEAR TREESPyrus communist0
Treatment
irrigated quince rootstockse0
Outcome
estimated yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-irrigatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees grafted on irrigated quince rootstocks exhibited higher gaseous exchanges, as well as estimated yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigated or non-irrigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quince rootstocks were more sensitive to water stress than Pyrus rootstocks.

Taxon
PEAR TREESPyrus communist0
Material
quince rootstockse0
Outcome
sensitivity to water stresse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Pyrus ssp. rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quince rootstocks showed more sensitivity to water stress than Pyrus ssp. rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEAR TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑

Cydonia oblonga · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

grafting · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 12 positive, 11 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.