Paper · 2023 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

Response of sugarcane to water stress under applied of different potassium levels combined with silicate and chitosan

Ahmed M.K. Ali; Ahmed F.I. Gadallah; Hanaa A. Zein El-A bdeen; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Water stress in Egypt is expected to further increase in the future as a result of climate change and rapid population growth that impact of crop production and soil properties. To evaluate and reduce the impact of water stress, two field experiments were conducted at Shandaweel Agricultural Research Station, Sohag Governorate, Egypt in 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 seasons under normal irrigation and water stress and different rates of K-fertilization combined with silicate and chitosan addition. The sugarcane cultivar (Giza-4) “Saccharum sp L.” was applied as a planting material. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was used as a split-split plot arrangement with three replicated. The results explained that water stress had a significant effect on all studied traits of sugarcane. Normal irrigation improved height, diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons. Moreover, increasing K-level to 48 kg K2O/fed resulted in a significant increase in all studied traits of sugarcane in both seasons. As well as the results indicated that the application of silicone + nano chitosan had positive effects on height and diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons reached to 90.2% under water stress compared with the production under normal irrigation. In addition, soil salinity (EC) and soil pH were generally decrease with treatments application meanwhile all other soil studied parameters (cations, anions and available NPK) were increase compared with control. Thus, it was found that, supplying sugarcane with a combination of both 48 kg K2O/fed and (silicon + nano chitosan) application can be recommended to adapt and reduce the negative impact of water stress on soil and crop production and get the economical cane and sugar yields, as well as the best quality traits of sugarcane crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation improved sugarcane growth traits

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Normal irrigatione0
Outcome
height, diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fede0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
water stresse1

Verbatim

e0

“Normal irrigation improved height, diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“under normal irrigation and water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation improved sugarcane quality traits

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Normal irrigatione0
Outcome
brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery%e0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
water stresse1

Verbatim

e0

“Normal irrigation improved height, diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“under normal irrigation and water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation improved cane and sugar yields

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Normal irrigatione0
Outcome
cane and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
water stresse1

Verbatim

e0

“Normal irrigation improved height, diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“under normal irrigation and water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium to 48 kg K2O/fed significantly increased all studied sugarcane traits in both seasons.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
48 kg K2O/fede0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“increasing K-level to 48 kg K2O/fed resulted in a significant increase in all studied traits of sugarcane in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicone plus nano chitosan positively affected sugarcane growth traits in both seasons under water stress.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
silicone + nano chitosane0
Outcome
height and diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fede0
Direction
positive effectse0
Comparator
production under normal irrigatione0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“the application of silicone + nano chitosan had positive effects on height and diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons reached to 90.2% under water stress compared with the production under normal irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicone plus nano chitosan positively affected sugarcane quality traits in both seasons under water stress.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
silicone + nano chitosane0
Outcome
brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery%e0
Direction
positive effectse0
Comparator
production under normal irrigatione0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“the application of silicone + nano chitosan had positive effects on height and diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons reached to 90.2% under water stress compared with the production under normal irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicone plus nano chitosan positively affected sugarcane cane and sugar yields in both seasons under water stress.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
silicone + nano chitosane0
Outcome
cane and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
positive effectse0
Value
90.2%e0
Comparator
production under normal irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the application of silicone + nano chitosan had positive effects on height and diameter stalk, number of millable canes/fed, brix%, sucrose% and sugar recovery% as well as cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons reached to 90.2% under water stress compared with the production under normal irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments generally decreased soil salinity and pH compared with control.

Treatment
treatments applicatione0
Outcome
soil salinity (EC) and soil pHe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“soil salinity (EC) and soil pH were generally decrease with treatments application meanwhile all other soil studied parameters (cations, anions and available NPK) were increase compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased soil cations, anions and available NPK compared with control.

Treatment
treatments applicatione0
Outcome
cations, anions and available NPKe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“soil salinity (EC) and soil pH were generally decrease with treatments application meanwhile all other soil studied parameters (cations, anions and available NPK) were increase compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1650 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 48 kg K2O/fed with silicon and nano chitosan to mitigate water stress and obtain economical yields and quality.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
supplying sugarcane with a combination of both 48 kg K2O/fed and (silicon + nano chitosan) applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“supplying sugarcane with a combination of both 48 kg K2O/fed and (silicon + nano chitosan) application can be recommended to adapt and reduce the negative impact of water stress on soil and crop production and get the economical cane and sugar yields, as well as the best quality traits of sugarcane crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1981 · show in text ↑

chitosan · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.