Paper · 2023 · International Journal Papier Advance and Scientific Review

Effect of Levels and Times of Application of Super Micro Plus Nanofertilizer on Sugar Yield and Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L. Under the Conditions of the Central Region of Iraq

Nidhal Y.A. Alghargan

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The experiment was carried out according to a completely randomized block design with three replications, and the data were analyzed statistically, and the results showed the following; (1) The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively; (2) The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively .While spraying the nanofertilizer at the beginning of the elongation stage showed a significant increase in juice purity amounted to 84.68%, Compared to the fertilizer application at the beginning of the tillering stage and the beginning of the maturity stage, which recorded 81.85 and 83.51%, respectively; (3) Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased the number of milling stems to 54.9 stems per m.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
Outcome
number of milling stemse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
54.9 stems.m ̄¹e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased sucrose percentage to 15.4%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
Outcome
percentage of sucrosee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
15.4%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased total dissolved solids to 17.5%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
Outcome
percentage of total dissolved solidse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
17.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased juice purity to 88.04%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
Outcome
percentage of juice puritye1
Direction
increasee1
Value
88.04%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased stem yield to 61.5 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
Outcome
stems yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased sugar yield to 9.34 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
9.34 tons.ha ̄¹e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased milling stems to 57.1 per m.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
Outcome
number of milling stemse2
Direction
increasee2
Value
57.1 stems.m ̄¹e2
Qualifier
in most of the studied characteristicse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased sucrose percentage to 14.1%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
Outcome
percentage of sucrosee2
Direction
increasee2
Value
14.1%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased total dissolved solids to 17.2%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
Outcome
percentage of total dissolved solidse2
Direction
increasee2
Value
17.2%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased stem yield to 53.6 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
Outcome
stems yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
53.6 tons.ha ̄¹e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased sugar yield to 7.63 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
Outcome
sugar yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of elongation significantly increased juice purity to 84.68%, above spraying at tillering (81.85%) and maturity (83.51%).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying the nanofertilizer at the beginning of the elongation stagee3
Outcome
juice puritye3
Direction
increasee3
Value
84.68%e3
Comparator
the fertilizer application at the beginning of the tillering stagee3

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e3

“While spraying the nanofertilizer at the beginning of the elongation stage showed a significant increase in juice purity amounted to 84.68%, Compared to the fertilizer application at the beginning of the tillering stage and the beginning of the maturity stage, which recorded 81.85 and 83.51%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased milling stems to 62 per m.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
Outcome
number of milling stemse4
Direction
increasee4
Value
62 stems.m ̄¹e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased sucrose percentage to 16.3%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
Outcome
percentage of sucrosee4
Direction
increasee4
Value
16.3%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased total dissolved solids to 18.0%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
Outcome
percentage of total dissolved solidse4
Direction
increasee4
Value
18.0%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased juice purity to 90.50%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
Outcome
percentage of juice puritye4
Direction
increasee4
Value
90.50%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased stem yield to 66.0 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
Outcome
stems yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased sugar yield to 10.30 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
Outcome
sugar yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1741 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 35 positive, 13 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.