Abstract
The experiment was carried out according to a completely randomized block design with three replications, and the data were analyzed statistically, and the results showed the following; (1) The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively; (2) The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively .While spraying the nanofertilizer at the beginning of the elongation stage showed a significant increase in juice purity amounted to 84.68%, Compared to the fertilizer application at the beginning of the tillering stage and the beginning of the maturity stage, which recorded 81.85 and 83.51%, respectively; (3) Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased the number of milling stems to 54.9 stems per m.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
- Outcome
- number of milling stemse1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 54.9 stems.m ̄¹e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e1“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased sucrose percentage to 15.4%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
- Outcome
- percentage of sucrosee1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 15.4%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e1“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased total dissolved solids to 17.5%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
- Outcome
- percentage of total dissolved solidse1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 17.5%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e1“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased juice purity to 88.04%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
- Outcome
- percentage of juice puritye1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 88.04%e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e1“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased stem yield to 61.5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
- Outcome
- stems yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e1“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanofertilizer at 2 g/l significantly increased sugar yield to 9.34 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹e1
- Outcome
- sugar yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e1“The use of nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ resulted in a significant increase in all the studied characteristics represented in number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield , and the sugar yield, as it reached 54.9 stems.m ̄¹, 15.4%, 17.5%, 88.04%, and 61.5 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 9.34 tons.ha ̄¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased milling stems to 57.1 per m.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
- Outcome
- number of milling stemse2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 57.1 stems.m ̄¹e2
- Qualifier
- in most of the studied characteristicse2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e2“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased sucrose percentage to 14.1%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
- Outcome
- percentage of sucrosee2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 14.1%e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e2“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased total dissolved solids to 17.2%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
- Outcome
- percentage of total dissolved solidse2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 17.2%e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e2“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased stem yield to 53.6 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
- Outcome
- stems yielde2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e2“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of tillering significantly increased sugar yield to 7.63 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stagee2
- Outcome
- sugar yielde2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e2“The spraying of nanofertilizer at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in a significant increase in most of the studied characteristics represented in mean number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, reaching 57.1 stems.m ̄¹ , 14.1%, 17.2%, and 53.6 tons.ha ̄¹ and 7.63 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at the beginning of elongation significantly increased juice purity to 84.68%, above spraying at tillering (81.85%) and maturity (83.51%).
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e3“While spraying the nanofertilizer at the beginning of the elongation stage showed a significant increase in juice purity amounted to 84.68%, Compared to the fertilizer application at the beginning of the tillering stage and the beginning of the maturity stage, which recorded 81.85 and 83.51%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased milling stems to 62 per m.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
- Outcome
- number of milling stemse4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 62 stems.m ̄¹e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e4“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased sucrose percentage to 16.3%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
- Outcome
- percentage of sucrosee4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 16.3%e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e4“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased total dissolved solids to 18.0%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
- Outcome
- percentage of total dissolved solidse4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 18.0%e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e4“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased juice purity to 90.50%.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
- Outcome
- percentage of juice puritye4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 90.50%e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e4“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased stem yield to 66.0 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
- Outcome
- stems yielde4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e4“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased sugar yield to 10.30 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
- Outcome
- sugar yielde4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”
e4“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →tillage · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
tillage · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nanoparticle · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.