Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased sugar yield to 10.30 t/ha.

A claim from Effect of Levels and Times of Application of Super Micro Plus Nanofertilizer on Sugar Yield and Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L. Under the Conditions of the Central Region of Iraq · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nanofertilizer at 2 g/l at tillering significantly increased sugar yield to 10.30 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stagee4
Outcome
sugar yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–148
e4

“Spraying the plants with nanofertilizer at the level of 2 g.l ̄¹ at the beginning of the tillering stage resulted in achieving the highest increase in each of the number of milling stems, the percentage of sucrose, the percentage of total dissolved solids, the percentage of juice purity, the stems yield, and the sugar yield, as it reached 62 stems.m ̄¹ ,16.3%, 18.0%, 90.50%, and 66.0 tons.ha ̄ ¹ and 10.30 tons.ha ̄ ¹ respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1741

Title

Effect of Levels and Times of Application of Super Micro Plus Nanofertilizer on Sugar Yield and Quality of Sugarcane Juice, Saccharum Officinarum L. Under the Conditions of the Central Region of Iraq

Nidhal Y.A. Alghargan International Journal Papier Advance and Scientific Review 2023. doi:10.47667/ijpasr.v4i1.204

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e8127e472d3e9d10bc5a70f58f623534b4e150e9c35ff482c8c06b85a607f2d1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

tillage · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.