Paper · 2023 · Irish Interdisciplinary Journal of Science & Research

Effect of Irrigation Water Level and N-fertilizer Rate on Yield and Water Productivity of Wheat Under Furrow Irrigation at Tibila Irrigation Scheme, Arsi Ethiopia

Negash Bedaso; Asnake Tilaye; Bayan Ahmed; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the leading cereals in the world.It belongs to the family Gramineae and it is the world's most widely cultivated cereal crop which ranks first followed by rice.It is preferable than rice for its higher seed protein content.It ranks first both in acreage and production among the grain crops of the world (FAO, 2008).Likewise, wheat is one of the strategic crops in Ethiopia, because of its role for food security, import substitution and supply of raw material for agro-processing industry.Ethiopia is the third largest wheat producing country in Africa (EIAR, 2020).This crop is one of the major cereal crops produced by 4.6 million smallholder farmers on 1.8 million hectares of land with an estimated annual production of 5.0 million tons at an average productivity of 2.8 t/ha which has been consistently increasing for the last 25 years in the country, but much lower than the world average 3.3 t/ha (EIAR, 2020).This is due to shortage of irrigation water, in sufficient farm resources, improper use of fertilizers and due to salinity and water logging.Nitrogen (N) and water are the most common limiting factors in agricultural systems throughout the world.Similarly, wheat crop need sufficient available water and N to achieve optimum yield and adequate grain-protein content (IAEA, 2000).Wajid et al. (2002) reported that wheat crop produced highest grain yield by applying irrigation at all definable growth stages.According to (IAEA, 2000), lower economical benefits for farmer often arise from the use of sub-optimal rate of N-fertilize.On the other hand, excessive irrigation and N-fertilizer use may result in environmental problem such A B S T R A C TThe response of wheat yield to different levels of irrigation and varying amounts of nitrogen fertilizer was investigated from 2020-2022 GC at Tibila irrigation scheme.Three levels of irrigation (70, 85, and 100% ETc) and three nitrogen rates (46, 69, and 92 kg/ha) were arranged in two factorial combination in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications.Recently released bread wheat variety king-bird was used as test crop.The experimental field was divided into 27 plots with plot size of 4m x 6m dimension to accommodate five furrows with spacing of 60cm and having 6m length.From the result, it is found that, irrigation and nitrogen levels both had a considerable impact on wheat grain yield.The analysis of variance result revealed that the maximum grain yield (5.88 tha -1 ) of wheat was recorded at 92 kg/ha nitrogen rate and 100% ETc irrigation level.The minimum grain yield (3.98 tha -1 ) was obtained from 46 kg/ha nitrogen and 70% ETc irrigation treatment.Similarly, the study revealed that other yield components like plant height, spike length, number of seed per spike, productive tiller number and above ground biomass of wheat increased with the increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation water level.Here, increasing the application rate of nitrogen fertilizer from (46-92) kgh -1 and water level from 70% ETc to full irrigation maximize yields of wheat.On the other hand, reducing water level from 100 to 85% ETc and N-fertilizer rate from 92 to 69 kg/ha was not reduce the yield significantly, rather it have water saving and economic advantage.Moreover the partial budget analysis revealed that an application of 85% ETc and 69 kg/ha nitrogen fertilizer is the best treatment to obtain an optimum yield and maximum benefit cost ratio in the study area.Therefore, application of 85% ETc irrigation and 69 kg/ha nitrogen is recommended for optimum returns of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization of wheat in the area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wheat grain yield was 5.88 tha -1 with 92 kg/ha nitrogen and 100% ETc irrigation.

Treatment
92 kg/ha nitrogen rate and 100% ETc irrigation levele0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.88 tha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the maximum grain yield (5.88 tha -1 ) of wheat was recorded at 92 kg/ha nitrogen rate and 100% ETc irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2463–2579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest wheat grain yield was 3.98 tha -1 with 46 kg/ha nitrogen and 70% ETc irrigation.

Treatment
46 kg/ha nitrogen and 70% ETc irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.98 tha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimum grain yield (3.98 tha -1 ) was obtained from 46 kg/ha nitrogen and 70% ETc irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2580–2687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, spike length and seeds per spike increased as nitrogen and irrigation increased.

Treatment
increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation water levele0
Outcome
plant height, spike length, number of seed per spikee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height, spike length, number of seed per spike, productive tiller number and above ground biomass of wheat increased with the increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation water level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2751–2949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Productive tiller number and aboveground biomass increased as nitrogen and irrigation increased.

Treatment
increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation water levele0
Outcome
productive tiller number and above ground biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“productive tiller number and above ground biomass of wheat increased with the increasing rates of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation water level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2805–2949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing irrigation and nitrogen did not significantly reduce wheat yield.

Treatment
reducing water level from 100 to 85% ETc and N-fertilizer rate from 92 to 69 kg/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not reducee0
Comparator
100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“reducing water level from 100 to 85% ETc and N-fertilizer rate from 92 to 69 kg/ha was not reduce the yield significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3123–3244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen had a water-saving advantage.

Treatment
reducing water level from 100 to 85% ETc and N-fertilizer rate from 92 to 69 kg/hae0
Outcome
water savinge0
Direction
savinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“reducing water level from 100 to 85% ETc and N-fertilizer rate from 92 to 69 kg/ha was not reduce the yield significantly, rather it have water saving and economic advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3123–3296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen had an economic advantage.

Treatment
reducing water level from 100 to 85% ETc and N-fertilizer rate from 92 to 69 kg/hae0
Outcome
economic advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“reducing water level from 100 to 85% ETc and N-fertilizer rate from 92 to 69 kg/ha was not reduce the yield significantly, rather it have water saving and economic advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3123–3296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 85% ETc and 69 kg/ha nitrogen treatment gave optimum yield and maximum benefit cost ratio.

Treatment
85% ETc and 69 kg/ha nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
optimum yield and maximum benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“an application of 85% ETc and 69 kg/ha nitrogen fertilizer is the best treatment to obtain an optimum yield and maximum benefit cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3348–3486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 85% ETc irrigation and 69 kg/ha nitrogen for optimum returns.

Outcome
application of 85% ETc irrigation and 69 kg/ha nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 85% ETc irrigation and 69 kg/ha nitrogen is recommended for optimum returns of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3516–3656 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.