Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Study on the efficacy of weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with ready-mix and tank-mix herbicides

Rajkumar Bala; Shiva Biswas; Manisha Phaugat; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The impacts of ready-mix and tank-mix herbicides treatment on weed control in wheat were studied in the field during the Rabi season of 2022-23 at Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University, College of Agriculture, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. The agronomic replicated field experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design, having ten treatments, viz. spray of ready-mix herbicide MES + IOD @ 12+2.4 g a.i. ha-1 and SUL + MET @ 25 + 4 g a.i. ha-1, and other spray of tank-mix herbicide SUL + CAR @ 25 + 20 g a.i. ha-1, SUL + (HAL+FLO) @ 25+12.76 g a.i. ha-1, SUL + PYR @ 25+18 g a.i. ha-1, CLO + MET @ 60+4 g a.i. ha-1, CLO + (HAL+FLO) 60+12.76 @ g a.i. ha-1 and CLO + PYR @ 60 +18 @ g a.i. ha-1 and was compared with the weedy check and two-hand weeding (20 and 40 DAS). During the crop growth period, consistently lowest and highest densities of total weed were recorded under 2-HW (20 and 40 DAS) and weed check, respectively. Observation recorded from 30 DAS to 60 DAS showed that the density of total weeds was statistically at par in almost all the herbicidal treatments and was statistically superior in the reduction of total weeds as compared to weed check. Observation recorded at 90 DAS showed that, among the herbicidal treatments, application of SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1, CLO+MET @ 60+4 g a.i. ha-1, and CLO+PYR @ 60+18 g a.i. ha-1 recorded significantly the lowest density of total weeds and was second best to 2-HW(20 and 40 DAS). Further, at harvest, 2-HW (20 and 40 DAS) and SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1 recorded at a par density of total weeds. The purpose of the research is to evaluate the response of ready-mix and tank-mix herbicides on weed dynamics in wheat and investigate the effect of ready-mix and tank-mix herbicides on the growth and yield of wheat. then calculate the economics of ready-mix and tank-mix herbicides for weed management in wheat. In Weed control, the experiment shows the result was the treatment of SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1 and CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 results in increased crop growth, wheat yield, and improved weed suppression, and crop growth was observed with the treatment on sulfosulfuron + Carfentazole (25 + 20 g/ ha). Results indicated that ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatment on weed control in wheat resulted in antagonistic effects on wheat profitability as well as productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total weed density was consistently lowest under two hand weedings and highest in the weed check during crop growth.

Treatment
2-HW (20 and 40 DAS)e0
Outcome
densities of total weede0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
weed checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“consistently lowest and highest densities of total weed were recorded under 2-HW (20 and 40 DAS) and weed check, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

From 30 to 60 DAS, total weed density was statistically similar across almost all herbicide treatments and lower than in the weed check.

Outcome
reduction of total weedse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
weed checke0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“statistically superior in the reduction of total weeds as compared to weed check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 DAS, SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1 recorded significantly the lowest density of total weeds among herbicidal treatments, second best to two hand weedings.

Treatment
SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
density of total weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1, CLO+MET @ 60+4 g a.i. ha-1, and CLO+PYR @ 60+18 g a.i. ha-1 recorded significantly the lowest density of total weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 DAS, CLO+MET @ 60+4 g a.i. ha-1 recorded significantly the lowest density of total weeds among herbicidal treatments, second best to two hand weedings.

Treatment
CLO+MET @ 60+4 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
density of total weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1, CLO+MET @ 60+4 g a.i. ha-1, and CLO+PYR @ 60+18 g a.i. ha-1 recorded significantly the lowest density of total weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 DAS, CLO+PYR @ 60+18 g a.i. ha-1 recorded significantly the lowest density of total weeds among herbicidal treatments, second best to two hand weedings.

Treatment
CLO+PYR @ 60+18 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
density of total weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1, CLO+MET @ 60+4 g a.i. ha-1, and CLO+PYR @ 60+18 g a.i. ha-1 recorded significantly the lowest density of total weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, total weed density under two hand weedings and SUL+CAR 25+20 g a.i. ha-1 was at par.

Treatment
SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
density of total weedse0
Direction
at a pare0
Comparator
2-HW (20 and 40 DAS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“at harvest, 2-HW (20 and 40 DAS) and SUL+CAR @ 25+20 g a.i. ha-1 recorded at a par density of total weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1 increased crop growth and wheat yield.

Treatment
SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
crop growth, wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment of SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1 and CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 results in increased crop growth, wheat yield, and improved weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1 improved weed suppression.

Treatment
SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
weed suppressione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment of SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1 and CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 results in increased crop growth, wheat yield, and improved weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 increased crop growth and wheat yield.

Treatment
CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
crop growth, wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment of SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1 and CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 results in increased crop growth, wheat yield, and improved weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 improved weed suppression.

Treatment
CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
weed suppressione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment of SUL+CAR 25 + 20g a.i. ha-1 and CLO+MET 60 + 4 g a.i. ha-1 results in increased crop growth, wheat yield, and improved weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatment on weed control in wheat had antagonistic effects on wheat profitability and productivity.

Treatment
ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatmente0
Outcome
wheat profitability as well as productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatment on weed control in wheat resulted in antagonistic effects on wheat profitability as well as productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2213–2360 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 466 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.