Paper · 2003 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Evaluation of Ready-mix of Mesosulfuron + Iodosulfuron for Weed Control in Wheat

Samar Singh; R. K. Malik; Darpal Singh; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during rabi 2000–01 and 2001–02 to evaluate the effect of mesosulfuron and iodosulfuron alone and their ready-made mixture for control of weeds in wheat. Ready-mixture of mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron at 15+3 g ha−1 provided effective control of weeds and produced effective tillers and grain yield of wheat similar to sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha−1 and the plots kept weed-free for the whole season. Mesosulfuron alone at 18.75 g ha−1 was at par with sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha-1 in reducing the density and dry weight of weeds. On an average, it reduced the dry weight of weeds by 90% over weedy check. Highest wheat yield (5220–5446 kg ha−1) was recorded in weed-free plots, which was statistically similar to that with sulfosulfuron (5195–5411 kg ha−1) at 25 g ha−1 and readymix of mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron (5152–5323 kg ha−1) at 15+3 g ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron at 15+3 g ha−1 gave effective weed control in wheat, similar in yield effect to sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha−1.

Treatment
Ready-mixture of mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron at 15+3 g ha−1e1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
control of weedse1
Direction
effectivee1
Comparator
sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Ready-mixture of mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron at 15+3 g ha−1 provided effective control of weeds and produced effective tillers and grain yield of wheat similar to sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron alone at 18.75 g ha−1 reduced weed density and dry weight at par with sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha-1 in wheat.

Treatment
Mesosulfuron alone at 18.75 g ha−1e2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
density and dry weight of weedse2
Direction
reducinge2
Comparator
sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha-1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Mesosulfuron alone at 18.75 g ha−1 was at par with sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha-1 in reducing the density and dry weight of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron alone reduced weed dry weight by 90% relative to the weedy check in wheat.

Treatment
Mesosulfuron alonee5
Interactor
weedse5weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
90%e5
Comparator
weedy checke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Mesosulfuron alone at 18.75 g ha−1 was at par with sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha-1 in reducing the density and dry weight of weeds. On an average, it reduced the dry weight of weeds by 90% over weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed Control in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was highest in weed-free plots, at 5220–5446 kg ha−1.

Treatment
weed-free plotse4
Outcome
wheat yielde4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
5220–5446 kg ha−1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Highest wheat yield (5220–5446 kg ha−1) was recorded in weed-free plots, which was statistically similar to that with sulfosulfuron (5195–5411 kg ha−1) at 25 g ha−1 and readymix of mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron (5152–5323 kg ha−1) at 15+3 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield with ready-mix mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron at 15+3 g ha−1 was statistically similar to sulfosulfuron at 25 g ha−1.

Treatment
readymix of mesosulfuron+iodosulfurone4
Outcome
wheat yielde4
Direction
similare4
Value
5152–5323 kg ha−1e4
Comparator
sulfosulfurone4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Highest wheat yield (5220–5446 kg ha−1) was recorded in weed-free plots, which was statistically similar to that with sulfosulfuron (5195–5411 kg ha−1) at 25 g ha−1 and readymix of mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron (5152–5323 kg ha−1) at 15+3 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–867 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.