Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatment on weed control in wheat had antagonistic effects on wheat profitability and productivity.

A claim from Study on the efficacy of weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with ready-mix and tank-mix herbicides · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatment on weed control in wheat had antagonistic effects on wheat profitability and productivity.

Treatment
ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatmente0
Outcome
wheat profitability as well as productivitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69
e0

“ready-mix and tank-mix herbicide treatment on weed control in wheat resulted in antagonistic effects on wheat profitability as well as productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2213–2360

Title

Study on the efficacy of weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with ready-mix and tank-mix herbicides

Rajkumar Bala; Shiva Biswas; Manisha Phaugat; et al. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2023. doi:10.33545/26174693.2023.v7.i2sc.203

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-9ee933ad91c061b77a0eaa7844bb25636b00e5e2202fcc6f9e8a9a21698d80b6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this claim · 466 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Weed-free plots gave the maximum wheat grain yield of 5.05 t/ha.

    Effect of different herbicides on weed growth and yield performance of wheat · 2012

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Tank mixtures of these herbicides increased wheat grain yield compared with individual application.

    Studies on the Chemical Weed Control in Wheat · 1997 · compared with individual application alone

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Wheat yield was highest in weed-free plots, at 5220–5446 kg ha−1.

    Evaluation of Ready-mix of Mesosulfuron + Iodosulfuron for Weed Control in Wheat · 2003

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    At high weed pressure, mechanical control increased yield compared with untreated plots.

    The effect of sowing date, stale seedbed, row width and mechanical weed control on weeds and yields of organic winter wheat · 2004 · compared with untreated

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Strict summer weed control produced high investment returns, ranging 6–1328%.

    Re-evaluating the contribution of summer fallow rain to wheat yield in southern Australia · 2011

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Conservation tillage wheat yield increased under moderate and maximum weed management versus minimum.

    Tillage and Weed Management Affects Winter Wheat Yield in an Integrated Pest Management System · 1994 · compared with minimum level

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Half and full herbicide doses often gave similar crop yield.

    Combining agronomic practices and herbicides improves weed management in wheat–canola rotations within zero-tillage production systems · 2005 · compared with 100% doses

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Herbicide-treated pasture plots gave higher wheat grain yield, 2.2 t/ha, than untreated plots, 1.2 t/ha, in the field experiment.

    Reduction of Rhizoctonia root rot of direct-drilled wheat by short-term chemical fallow · 1987 · compared with untreated plots

    Opposite direction

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.