Paper · 2023 · Agriculture and Natural Resources

Field efficacy of aqueous extracts of Artemisia annua, Commelina benghalensis and Euphorbia hirta on rice growth, yield and brown spot disease incidence

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Importance of the work: Brown leaf spot disease is one of the major causes of yield losses in rice production in Cameroon.Objectives: To evaluate the bioactivity of aqueous extracts of three Cameroonian medicinal plants on rice growth, yield and brown spot disease incidence.Materials & Methods: Plant extracts were tested at two doses (1 kg/15 L and 2 kg/15 L sprayed), while water and Mancozeb were used as negative and positive controls, respectively, in a split plot design made up of two factors (variety and plant extract).The varieties were NERICA 8, NERICA L56, Long grain red rice and Toukbem.Results: NERICAs 8 and L56 (exotic) and, Toukbem (local) varieties had the highest number of leaves and tillers while Toukbem had the highest plants and leaf area at 9 wk after transplanting.The numbers of leaves (31.3) and tillers (9.7) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in plants treated with Euphorbia hirta extract at 67 g/L compared to Artemesia annua and Commelina benghalensis extracts.Brown spot severity was lower with E. hirta at 134 g/L (30%) and not significantly different to Mancozeb (23.6%).The NERICA L56 × E. hirta interaction at 134 g/L had the highest yield (5.8 t/ha) compared to the NERICA L56 × Mancozeb (6.1 t/ha) interaction.Chemical analysis of the E. hirta aqueous extract showed the presence of known bioactive compounds.Main finding: Field application of aqueous extract of E. hirta at 134 g/L could be used as a bioagent for rice brown spot management.The formulation of a natural product with this extract is necessary for large-scale field applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NERICA 8, NERICA L56 and Toukbem had the highest leaf and tiller counts.

Material
Toukbeme0
Outcome
number of leaves and tillerse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“NERICAs 8 and L56 (exotic) and, Toukbem (local) varieties had the highest number of leaves and tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toukbem had the greatest plant height and leaf area at nine weeks after transplanting.

Material
Toukbeme0
Outcome
plants and leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
9 wk after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Toukbem had the highest plants and leaf area at 9 wk after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Euphorbia hirta extract at 67 g/L increased rice leaf number versus the other extracts.

Treatment
Euphorbia hirta extract at 67 g/Le0
Outcome
numbers of leavese0
Direction
highere0
Value
31.3e0
Comparator
Artemesia annua and Commelina benghalensis extractse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The numbers of leaves (31.3) and tillers (9.7) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in plants treated with Euphorbia hirta extract at 67 g/L compared to Artemesia annua and Commelina benghalensis extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Euphorbia hirta extract at 67 g/L increased rice tiller number versus the other extracts.

Treatment
Euphorbia hirta extract at 67 g/Le0
Outcome
tillerse0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.7e0
Comparator
Artemesia annua and Commelina benghalensis extractse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The numbers of leaves (31.3) and tillers (9.7) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in plants treated with Euphorbia hirta extract at 67 g/L compared to Artemesia annua and Commelina benghalensis extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown spot severity was 30% with E. hirta at 134 g/L, without a significant difference from Mancozeb at 23.6%.

Treatment
E. hirta at 134 g/Le0
Outcome
Brown spot severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
23.6%e0
Comparator
Mancozebe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Brown spot severity was lower with E. hirta at 134 g/L (30%) and not significantly different to Mancozeb (23.6%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NERICA L56 by E. hirta treatment yielded 5.8 t/ha versus 6.1 t/ha under Mancozeb.

Material
NERICA L56e0
Treatment
E. hirta interaction at 134 g/Le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.8 t/hae0
Qualifier
6.1 t/hae0
Comparator
Mancozebe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The NERICA L56 × E. hirta interaction at 134 g/L had the highest yield (5.8 t/ha) compared to the NERICA L56 × Mancozeb (6.1 t/ha) interaction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical analysis found known bioactive compounds in the E. hirta aqueous extract.

Taxon
Euphorbia hirtaEuphorbia hirtat0
Outcome
presence of known bioactive compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia hirta
Euphorbia hirta · TaxonJuan Carlos Fonseca Mata · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Euphorbia hirta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chemical analysis of the E. hirta aqueous extract showed the presence of known bioactive compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1353 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend E. hirta extract at 134 g/L for rice brown spot management.

Outcome
Field application of aqueous extract of E. hirta at 134 g/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field application of aqueous extract of E. hirta at 134 g/L could be used as a bioagent for rice brown spot management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for formulation of a natural product for large scale field application.

Outcome
formulation of a natural product with this extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The formulation of a natural product with this extract is necessary for large-scale field applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1589 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

208 papers: 193 positive, 15 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

204 papers more in this group

See all 208 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.