Paper · 2022 · Biotech Today

Studies on varietal response of finger millet (Elusine Coracana (L.) Gaertn.) production in Bhatwari Block of district Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand

Rakesh Kumar; Mukesh Kumar; Himani Purohit; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present studies have been carried out to find out the location specific suitable varieties in terms of biomass and productivity in district Uttarkashi. Three varieties of Finger Millet (VL-149, VL-315, VL-146) with local check had been grown in village Rathal of district Uttarkashi. The data related to the growth and productivity of millet crop was observed. The result obtained reveled that all the three improved varieties were more productive as compared to the local cultivars. The productivity of improved varieties of finger millet was about three times more than the local variety. The improved varieties i.e. VL-149, VL-315 and VL-146 showed significant improvement in grain and straw yields. Apart from this, seed treatments, line sowing, and timely weeding enhanced the yield of local variety too. As compared to the local variety, the improved varieties VL-149, VL-315 and VL-146 produced much higher grain yields, amounting 17.31, 13.30 and 14.93 Q/ha, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-149 produced 17.31 Q/ha grain yield, above the local variety.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-149e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
much highere0
Value
17.31e0
Comparator
local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to the local variety, the improved varieties VL-149, VL-315 and VL-146 produced much higher grain yields, amounting 17.31, 13.30 and 14.93 Q/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-315 produced 13.30 Q/ha grain yield, above the local variety.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-315e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
much highere0
Value
13.30e0
Comparator
local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to the local variety, the improved varieties VL-149, VL-315 and VL-146 produced much higher grain yields, amounting 17.31, 13.30 and 14.93 Q/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-146 produced 14.93 Q/ha grain yield, above the local variety.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-146e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
much highere0
Value
14.93 Q/hae0
Comparator
local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to the local variety, the improved varieties VL-149, VL-315 and VL-146 produced much higher grain yields, amounting 17.31, 13.30 and 14.93 Q/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved varieties had about three times the productivity of the local variety.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Material
improved varietiese0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
moree0
Value
about three timese0
Comparator
local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The productivity of improved varieties of finger millet was about three times more than the local variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–593 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved varieties significantly increased grain and straw yields.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-149, VL-315 and VL-146e0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improved varieties i.e. VL-149, VL-315 and VL-146 showed significant improvement in grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments enhanced yield of the local variety.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
seed treatmentse0
Outcome
yield of local varietye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatments, line sowing, and timely weeding enhanced the yield of local variety too”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line sowing enhanced yield of the local variety.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
line sowinge0
Outcome
yield of local varietye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatments, line sowing, and timely weeding enhanced the yield of local variety too”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timely weeding enhanced yield of the local variety.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
timely weedinge0
Outcome
yield of local varietye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatments, line sowing, and timely weeding enhanced the yield of local variety too”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.