Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in the experimental plots of DKS farm, IGKV, Bhatapara Dist- Baloda Bazaar, Chhattisgarh during kharif season of the year 2019. The soil of the experimental field was alfisol and climate was sub-humid with a total rainfall of 872.2 mm during the crop growth. The objectives of experiment were to the study changes in soil micronutrient status and its uptake by different nutrient management and seed priming and its effect on yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design. The treatments constituted with five nutrient management N1 (control), N2 (125 kg Neem cake + 1.25 tons/ha vermicompost), N3 (50“kg/ha N : 50 kg/ha P2O5 : 50 kg /ha K2O”and 2% Borax spray at flowering), N4 (125 kg Neem cake + 1.25 tons/ha vermicompost + 50 kg/ha N : 50 kg/ha P2O5 : 50 kg /ha K2O and 2% Borax spray at flowering) and N5 (Recommended “dose of fertilizer i.e. 20 kg/ha N”: 20 kg/ha P2O5 : 10 kg /ha K2O) in main plots with four priming treatment P1 (control), P2 (Hydro priming for 6 hrs), P3 (Seed priming with 2% KH2PO4 for 6 hrs) and P4 (Seed priming with 20% liquid Pseudomonas fluorescens) in sub plots. Results revealed that available cationic micronutrients in soil increased significantly and found higher where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied. The grain, straw and ultimately the biological yields were found higher where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied however, the priming treatments did not influenced the yield significantly. The content of cationic micronutrient namely Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn in plant tissue was not affected by any nutrient management and seed priming treatments however the uptake Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn by grain straw and ultimately total uptake in finger millet increased significantly where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Higher chemical fertilizer doses, alone or with organic manure, significantly increased available soil cationic micronutrients.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana)
Eleusine coracanae1 - Treatment
- higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manurese0
- Outcome
- available cationic micronutrients in soile0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“available cationic micronutrients in soil increased significantly and found higher where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher chemical fertilizer doses, alone or with organic manure, produced higher grain, straw and biological yields.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana)Eleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manurese0
- Outcome
- grain, straw and ultimately the biological yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain, straw and ultimately the biological yields were found higher where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed priming did not significantly influence yield.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana)Eleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- priming treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the priming treatments did not influenced the yield significantly”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management and seed priming did not affect Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn content in plant tissue.
- Taxon
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana)Eleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- nutrient management and seed priming treatmentse0
- Outcome
- content of cationic micronutrient namely Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn in plant tissuee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of cationic micronutrient namely Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn in plant tissue was not affected by any nutrient management and seed priming treatments”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher chemical fertilizer doses, alone or with organic manure, significantly increased Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn uptake in finger millet grain, straw and total biomass.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manurese0
- Outcome
- uptake Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn by grain straw and ultimately total uptake in finger millete0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the uptake Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn by grain straw and ultimately total uptake in finger millet increased significantly where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →seed treatment · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →organic · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →organic · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.