Abstract
The genetic variation in straw quality of fingermillet and the effects of locationf management and NPK fertilization on quality of fingermillet straw was studied in four experiments. In experiment I, 42 cultivars of 3 genetic groups differing in days to maturity (Short, Medium and Late) were studied to assess the genetic variability. The short duration cultivars had significantly (P < 0.01) higher N content, lower NDF content, higher IVOMD and IVNDFD than the medium and late duration cultivars. The IVNDFD of leaves was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than that of stems. In experiment II, 21 cultivars grown at three locations with different soil and climatic conditions showed a wide difference in grain production, height, stem weight, OM and NDF content and IVNDFD of straw. In experiment III, three cultivars were harvested from anthesis to grain maturity or were kept as a standing crop for ten days after maturity. Straw harvested at maturity was also stored under roof over a period of 5 months. NDF content increased (P < 0.05) with plant maturity, and kept increasing during storage. The IVOMD and IVNDFD declined with age before or after harvest (P < 0.05). In Experiment IV, application of NPK ( 0 : 0 : 0 , 50 : 25 : 25 and 100 : 50 : 50) increased the total biomass production per hectare without altering the harvest index of three genetically different cultivars (Indaf-8, PR-202, and Hullubele). The OM content and IVOMD remained unchanged, while the NDF content and IVNDFD decreased (P < 0.01) with increasing level of NPK. The traditional variety (Hullubele) known for fodder production had a bettter straw IVOMD than the improved varieties. It was concluded, that the quality of fingermillet straw in terms of IVOMD was affected by parameters such as genotype, location, moment of harvest, storage and fertilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Short duration finger millet cultivars had significantly higher N content than medium and late duration cultivars.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Material
- short duration cultivarse0
- Outcome
- N contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- the medium and late duration cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The short duration cultivars had significantly (P < 0.01) higher N content, lower NDF content, higher IVOMD and IVNDFD than the medium and late duration cultivars”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
Short duration finger millet cultivars had significantly higher IVOMD and IVNDFD than medium and late duration cultivars.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Material
- short duration cultivarse0
- Outcome
- IVOMD and IVNDFDe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- the medium and late duration cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The short duration cultivars had significantly (P < 0.01) higher N content, lower NDF content, higher IVOMD and IVNDFD than the medium and late duration cultivars”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
Short duration finger millet cultivars had significantly lower NDF content than medium and late duration cultivars.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Material
- short duration cultivarse0
- Outcome
- NDF contente0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- the medium and late duration cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The short duration cultivars had significantly (P < 0.01) higher N content, lower NDF content, higher IVOMD and IVNDFD than the medium and late duration cultivars”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
IVNDFD of finger millet leaves was significantly higher than that of stems.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Outcome
- IVNDFDe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- stemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The IVNDFD of leaves was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than that of stems”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
Twenty-one cultivars grown at three locations differed widely in grain production, height and stem weight.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Outcome
- grain production, height, stem weighte0
- Qualifier
- wide differencee0
- Setting
- three locations with different soil and climatic conditionse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“21 cultivars grown at three locations with different soil and climatic conditions showed a wide difference in grain production, height, stem weight, OM and NDF content and IVNDFD of straw”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
Twenty-one cultivars grown at three locations differed widely in straw OM and NDF content and IVNDFD.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Outcome
- OM and NDF content and IVNDFD of strawe0
- Qualifier
- wide differencee0
- Setting
- three locations with different soil and climatic conditionse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“21 cultivars grown at three locations with different soil and climatic conditions showed a wide difference in grain production, height, stem weight, OM and NDF content and IVNDFD of straw”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
NDF content of straw increased with plant maturity.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- plant maturitye0
- Outcome
- NDF contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“NDF content increased (P < 0.05) with plant maturity, and kept increasing during storage”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
NDF content of straw kept increasing during storage.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- storagee0
- Outcome
- NDF contente0
- Direction
- kept increasinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“NDF content increased (P < 0.05) with plant maturity, and kept increasing during storage”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
IVOMD and IVNDFD declined with age before or after harvest.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- age before or after harveste0
- Outcome
- IVOMD and IVNDFDe0
- Direction
- declinede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The IVOMD and IVNDFD declined with age before or after harvest (P < 0.05)”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK application at 0:0:0, 50:25:25 and 100:50:50 increased total biomass production per hectare of three cultivars.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- application of NPK ( 0 : 0 : 0 , 50 : 25 : 25 and 100 : 50 : 50)e0
- Outcome
- total biomass production per hectaree0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of NPK ( 0 : 0 : 0 , 50 : 25 : 25 and 100 : 50 : 50) increased the total biomass production per hectare”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK application did not alter the harvest index of the three cultivars.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- application of NPKe0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Direction
- without alteringe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of NPK”
e1“without altering the harvest index”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
OM content and IVOMD of straw remained unchanged with increasing NPK level.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- increasing level of NPKe1
- Outcome
- OM content and IVOMDe0
- Direction
- remained unchangede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The OM content and IVOMD remained unchanged”
e1“increasing level of NPK”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
NDF content and IVNDFD of straw decreased with increasing NPK level.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- increasing level of NPKe0
- Outcome
- NDF content and IVNDFDe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the NDF content and IVNDFD decreased (P < 0.01) with increasing level of NPK”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
Claim · model-written summary
The traditional variety Hullubele had better straw IVOMD than the improved varieties.
- Taxon
- Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracanat0 - Material
- Hullubelee0
- Outcome
- straw IVOMDe0
- Direction
- betttere0
- Comparator
- the improved varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The traditional variety (Hullubele) known for fodder production had a bettter straw IVOMD than the improved varieties”
t0“Eleusine coracana”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.