Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher chemical fertilizer doses, alone or with organic manure, produced higher grain, straw and biological yields.

A claim from Changes in soil micronutrient status by different nutrient management and seed priming and its effect on yield and micronutrient uptake of finger millet (Eleusine coracana) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher chemical fertilizer doses, alone or with organic manure, produced higher grain, straw and biological yields.

Taxon
finger millet (Eleusine coracana)Eleusine coracanae1
Treatment
higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manurese0
Outcome
grain, straw and ultimately the biological yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain, straw and ultimately the biological yields were found higher where either higher doses of chemical fertilizers or the chemical fertilizers in combination with organic manures were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1608
e1

“finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–501

Title

Changes in soil micronutrient status by different nutrient management and seed priming and its effect on yield and micronutrient uptake of finger millet (Eleusine coracana)

Rajesh Kumar; SS Sengar; AK Singh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2021

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e604336f2803fcc216d5e0417f8bec9606d0a6bb582383a17ce8ecd07b8e1d14 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

165 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.