Paper · 2022 · Biotech Today

Assessment of Phytotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Vigna mungo

Vijay Kumar Sinhal; V.P. Singh; Sanjay Kumar Garg; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Currently, nanotechnology finds widespread applications in diverse fields, including medicine, agriculture, crop improvement, and healthcare. This surge in utilization has prompted concerns about the potential impact of nanoparticles on plant and animal health. The present study aims to assess the phytotoxic and cytotoxic effects of zinc nanoparticles on Vigna mungo. The experiment involved pre-soaking seeds of Vigna mungo in different concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles (6.3, 7.3, and 8.3 mg/L) to evaluate their phytotoxic and cytotoxic effects. The results revealed the most substantial reductions in various growth parameters, such as seedling height, fresh and dry seedling weights, chlorophyll content, and protein content, particularly with the highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L), as compared to the lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L). Notably, these reductions were more pronounced in the T-9 variety compared to the PU-35 variety. Similarly, the highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L) led to significant reductions in cytotoxic parameters like seed germination and mitotic index. The presence of chromosomal anomalies, such as sticky chromosomes, chromosomal bridges, laggards, clumping, and binucleate conditions, was also most pronounced with the highest ZnO nanoparticle dose (8.3 mg/L), in contrast to the lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L). Consequently, the overall frequency of chromosomal anomalies was greatest in the T-9 variety with the highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L). These findings underscore the distinct phytotoxic and cytotoxic effects of zinc nanoparticles on Vigna mungo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nanoparticle dose most reduced seedling height and fresh and dry weights relative to lower doses.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L)e0
Outcome
seedling height, fresh and dry seedling weightse0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most substantial reductions in various growth parameters, such as seedling height, fresh and dry seedling weights, chlorophyll content, and protein content, particularly with the highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L), as compared to the lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nanoparticle dose most reduced chlorophyll and protein content.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, and protein contente0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most substantial reductions in various growth parameters, such as seedling height, fresh and dry seedling weights, chlorophyll content, and protein content, particularly with the highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L), as compared to the lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions were more pronounced in T-9 than PU-35.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Material
T-9 varietye0
Outcome
these reductionse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
PU-35 varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these reductions were more pronounced in the T-9 variety compared to the PU-35 variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest dose significantly reduced seed germination and mitotic index.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L)e0
Outcome
seed germination and mitotic indexe0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L) led to significant reductions in cytotoxic parameters like seed germination and mitotic index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromosomal anomalies were most pronounced at the highest dose relative to lower doses.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
highest ZnO nanoparticle dose (8.3 mg/L)e0
Outcome
chromosomal anomaliese0
Direction
most pronouncede0
Comparator
lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presence of chromosomal anomalies, such as sticky chromosomes, chromosomal bridges, laggards, clumping, and binucleate conditions, was also most pronounced with the highest ZnO nanoparticle dose (8.3 mg/L), in contrast to the lower doses (6.3 & 7.3 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall chromosomal anomaly frequency was greatest in T-9 at the highest dose.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Material
T-9 varietye0
Treatment
highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L)e0
Outcome
overall frequency of chromosomal anomaliese0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overall frequency of chromosomal anomalies was greatest in the T-9 variety with the highest dose of ZnO nanoparticles (8.3 mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.