Paper · 1987 · Madras Agricultural Journal

INTERCROPPING IN RAINFED RAGI

BUDHAR M.N; GOPALASWAMY N

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted for two years (1982-1983) under rainfed conditions at Regional Research Station, Paiyur to identify the suitable intercrops. Lablab, redgram maize, sorghum, soybean and greengram as intercrops in ragi each at 4:1, 6:1 and 8:1 ratio was compared with pure crop of ragi. Ragi as pure crop gave higher grain yield than in intercropping system. Intercropping systems gave higher net income than the sole crop. Raising ragi with greengram at 4:1 ratio gave the highest net income (Rs. 2374/ha) compared to pure crop of ragi (Rs. 1991/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure ragi produced higher grain yield than intercropped ragi.

Treatment
pure crope0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ragi as pure crop gave higher grain yield than in intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAGI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping produced higher net income than sole cropping.

Treatment
Intercropping systemse0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping systems gave higher net income than the sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“RAGI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ragi with greengram at 4:1 had the highest net income, Rs. 2374/ha versus Rs. 1991/ha for pure ragi.

Treatment
ragi with greengram at 4:1 ratioe0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 2374/hae0
Qualifier
Rs. 1991/hae0
Comparator
pure crop of ragie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Raising ragi with greengram at 4:1 ratio gave the highest net income (Rs. 2374/ha) compared to pure crop of ragi (Rs. 1991/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–565 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.