Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of herbicide and straw mulch on weed growth, productivity and profitability of wheat under different tillage practices in Eastern India

D.K. Jaiswal; B. Duary; Sushree Pratikshya Rani; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of straw mulch and herbicides on weed growth and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different tillage practices. Two tillage practices in main plot [zero tillage (ZT) and conventional tillage (CT)], eight weed management practices in sub-plot [pendimethalin (PMT) at 0.75 kg/ha, clodinafoppropargyl + metsulfuron-methyl (CP + MSM) at 0.40 kg/ha, straw mulching (SM) at 4.0 t/ha, PMT at 0.75 kg/ha followed by (fb) CP + MSM at 0.40 kg/ha, PMT at 0.75 kg/ha fb SM 4 t/ha, SM 4 t/ha fb CP + MSM 0.40 kg/ha, three hand weeding and weedy check] were assigned in a split plot design replicated thrice. Zero tillage had lower density as well as biomass of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop., Gnaphalium indicum (L.), Polygonum plebeium R.Br., Spilanthes calva DC and total weed than CT. Pendimethalin fb CP + MSM recorded significantly lowest total weed density and biomass. Compared to pendimethalin fb CP + MSM, pendimethalin fb SM enhanced grain yield of wheat by 9.6, 5.5 and 7.5% in first year, second year and when pooled over the years, respectively. Zero tillage among tillage practices and PMT fb SM or PMT fb CP + MSM among weed management practices appeared to be effective for better weed management and higher productivity as well as profitability of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage lowered weed density and biomass in wheat compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
Zero tillagee1
Interactor
Digitaria sanguinalisDigitaria sanguinalise1weed
Outcome
density as well as biomasse1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
Gnaphalium indicum (L.), Polygonum plebeium R.Br., Spilanthes calva DCe1
Comparator
CTe1
Setting
Eastern Indiat1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Digitaria sanguinalis
Digitaria sanguinalis · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zero tillage had lower density as well as biomass of Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop., Gnaphalium indicum (L.), Polygonum plebeium R.Br., Spilanthes calva DC and total weed than CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–845 · show in text ↑
t1

“in Eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by CP + MSM gave the lowest total weed density and biomass.

Treatment
Pendimethalin fb CP + MSMe2
Outcome
total weed density and biomasse2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pendimethalin fb CP + MSM recorded significantly lowest total weed density and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by straw mulch increased wheat grain yield by 9.6% in the first year compared with pendimethalin followed by CP + MSM.

Treatment
pendimethalin fb SMe3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
9.6e3
Qualifier
in first yeare3
Comparator
pendimethalin fb CP + MSMe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to pendimethalin fb CP + MSM, pendimethalin fb SM enhanced grain yield of wheat by 9.6, 5.5 and 7.5% in first year, second year and when pooled over the years, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by straw mulch increased wheat grain yield by 5.5% in the second year compared with pendimethalin followed by CP + MSM.

Treatment
pendimethalin fb SMe3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
5.5e3
Qualifier
second yeare3
Comparator
pendimethalin fb CP + MSMe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to pendimethalin fb CP + MSM, pendimethalin fb SM enhanced grain yield of wheat by 9.6, 5.5 and 7.5% in first year, second year and when pooled over the years, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by straw mulch increased pooled wheat grain yield by 7.5% compared with pendimethalin followed by CP + MSM.

Treatment
pendimethalin fb SMe3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
7.5e3
Qualifier
when pooled over the yearse3
Comparator
pendimethalin fb CP + MSMe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to pendimethalin fb CP + MSM, pendimethalin fb SM enhanced grain yield of wheat by 9.6, 5.5 and 7.5% in first year, second year and when pooled over the years, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage, and pendimethalin followed by straw mulch or CP + MSM, appear effective for better weed management and higher wheat productivity and profitability.

Outcome
better weed management and higher productivity as well as profitabilitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–146 · show in text ↑
e4

“Zero tillage among tillage practices and PMT fb SM or PMT fb CP + MSM among weed management practices appeared to be effective for better weed management and higher productivity as well as profitability of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1329 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.