Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2019 to study the effect of tillage and nutrient management strategies on rice productivity, nutrient uptake and soil properties in Eastern Indo Gangetic Plains (EIGP) of India. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications. Nine treatment combinations comprising of three tillage methods in the main plots viz., Conventional tillage, Zero tillage and Zero tillage + Residue management and three nutrient management practices viz., recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), SSNM based on Nutrient expert and 60 % RDN + green seeker guided N application (GSGN) + 100% RDP + 100% RDK in the subplot. The results of the study revealed that residue management with zero tillage practice resulted in 14.03 % and 9.27 % higher grain and straw yield than conventional tillage respectively. Zero tillage with residue management increased nutrient uptake to the maximum of 86.71 kg N, 24.62 kg P and 99.99 kg K/ha as compared to conventional tillage. Among nutrient management, SSNM based on Nutrient expert exhibited the highest grain (4.5 t/ha ) and straw yields (6.4 t/ha ), while 60 % RDN+ GSGN + 100% RDP + 100% RDK showed at par of these values. Adoption of SSNM based on Nutrient expert resulted in maximum N, P and K uptake. Different tillage and nutrient management regimes did not affect the soil properties significantly. Thus, zero tillage and residue management with SSNM based on Nutrient expert is a viable management practice for improving productivity under DSR in EIGP of India.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Residue management with zero tillage gave 14.03% higher rice grain yield than conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- residue management with zero tillage practicee1
- Outcome
- grain and straw yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 14.03 %e1
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e1“residue management with zero tillage practice resulted in 14.03 % and 9.27 % higher grain and straw yield than conventional tillage respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Residue management with zero tillage gave 9.27% higher rice straw yield than conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- residue management with zero tillage practicee1
- Outcome
- grain and straw yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 9.27 %e1
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e1“residue management with zero tillage practice resulted in 14.03 % and 9.27 % higher grain and straw yield than conventional tillage respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage with residue management increased N uptake to 86.71 kg N/ha compared with conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Zero tillage with residue managemente2
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 86.71 kg Ne2
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e2“Zero tillage with residue management increased nutrient uptake to the maximum of 86.71 kg N, 24.62 kg P and 99.99 kg K/ha as compared to conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage with residue management increased P uptake to 24.62 kg P/ha compared with conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Zero tillage with residue managemente2
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 24.62 kg Pe2
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e2“Zero tillage with residue management increased nutrient uptake to the maximum of 86.71 kg N, 24.62 kg P and 99.99 kg K/ha as compared to conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage with residue management increased K uptake to 99.99 kg K/ha compared with conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Zero tillage with residue managemente2
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 99.99 kg K/hae2
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e2“Zero tillage with residue management increased nutrient uptake to the maximum of 86.71 kg N, 24.62 kg P and 99.99 kg K/ha as compared to conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM based on Nutrient expert gave the highest rice grain yield, 4.5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SSNM based on Nutrient experte3
- Outcome
- graine3
- Value
- 4.5 t/hae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e3“SSNM based on Nutrient expert exhibited the highest grain (4.5 t/ha ) and straw yields (6.4 t/ha )”
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM based on Nutrient expert gave the highest rice straw yield, 6.4 t/ha.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SSNM based on Nutrient experte3
- Outcome
- straw yieldse3
- Value
- 6.4 t/hae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e3“SSNM based on Nutrient expert exhibited the highest grain (4.5 t/ha ) and straw yields (6.4 t/ha )”
Claim · model-written summary
The 60% RDN + GSGN + 100% RDP + 100% RDK treatment gave rice yields at par with SSNM based on Nutrient expert.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 60 % RDN+ GSGN + 100% RDP + 100% RDKe4
- Outcome
- at par of these valuese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e4“60 % RDN+ GSGN + 100% RDP + 100% RDK showed at par of these values”
Claim · model-written summary
Adoption of SSNM based on Nutrient expert gave maximum N, P and K uptake in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SSNM based on Nutrient experte5
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee5
- Direction
- maximume5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e5“Adoption of SSNM based on Nutrient expert resulted in maximum N, P and K uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
Different tillage and nutrient management regimes did not significantly affect soil properties.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Different tillage and nutrient management regimese6
- Outcome
- soil propertiese6
- Direction
- did not affecte6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e6“Different tillage and nutrient management regimes did not affect the soil properties significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage and residue management with SSNM based on Nutrient expert is a viable practice for improving rice productivity under DSR in EIGP of India.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- a viable management practice for improving productivitye7
- Setting
- EIGP of Indiae7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
e7“zero tillage and residue management with SSNM based on Nutrient expert is a viable management practice for improving productivity under DSR in EIGP of India”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.