Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Implications of minimum tillage and integrated nutrient management on yield and soil health of rice-lentil cropping system – being a resource conservation technology

Urjashi Bhattacharya; Manish Kumar Naskar; Visha Kumari Venugopalan; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Conventional tillage methods and indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers are causes of edaphic problems like soil degradation and loss of soil fertility which reduces crop yield. Puddling now-a-days, has become a major challenge for farmers due to breaking the soil structure, deficit water regimes, and depletion of soil health. Keeping in view, the absolute need to fulfill food security as well as sustainability, an experiment was conducted for 2 years on a rice-lentil cropping system during 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 in sandy clay loam soil of a new alluvial zone of eastern India to evaluate effects of minimum tillage and integrated nutrient management on yield and soil health. Conventional tillage (CT) direct seeded rice-lentil, Minimum tillage(MT) direct seeded rice-lentil, MT transplanted rice-lentil and MT direct seeded rice-lentil were kept as main plot treatments and control (without any fertilizer), 100% RDF, 75% nitrogen + FYM, 75% nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum and 75% Nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + Zinc Sulphate were kept as subplot treatments during the study. Though conventional tillage treatments recorded higher LAI, CGR and yield in the first year of study in the case of rice; during the second year, minimum tillage treatments showed significantly ( p ≤ 0.05) better results in the aforesaid aspects with MT DSR -L having a maximum yield of 5.17 t ha −1 . In the case of lentil minimum tillage treatments had better results for both years, with MT DSR -L treatment having the highest yield of 8.084 t ha −1 . Among the nutrient schedules, the crops had better LAI, CGR and yield during the first year in the case of 100% RDF treatment, but in the second year, 75% Nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + Zinc Sulphate had the highest respective values. Soil organic carbon was marginally improved by both tillage and nutrient treatments, while soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase activity and microbial count were significantly influenced. The combination of MT DSR -L and 75% Nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + Zinc Sulphate (N 5 ) treatment showed the maximum values for all soil biological parameters leading to improve soil health. The results of the experiment concluded that the practice of minimum tillage and integrated nutrient management may be recommended to enhance the yield and stability of rice-lentil cropping systems in sandy clay loam soil of a new alluvial zone of eastern India by acting as an alternative for the decline of soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first year, conventional tillage gave higher LAI, CGR and yield in rice.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
LAI, CGR and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Though conventional tillage treatments recorded higher LAI, CGR and yield in the first year of study in the case of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second year, minimum tillage treatments gave significantly better results than in the first-year pattern for rice LAI, CGR and yield.

Treatment
minimum tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
better results in the aforesaid aspectse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
second yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the second year, minimum tillage treatments showed significantly ( p ≤ 0.05) better results in the aforesaid aspects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-lentil cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MT direct-seeded rice-lentil had a maximum rice yield of 5.17 t ha-1.

Treatment
MT DSR -Le0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.17 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MT DSR -L having a maximum yield of 5.17 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-lentil cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In lentil, minimum tillage treatments gave better results in both years.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
minimum tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of lentil minimum tillage treatments had better results for both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MT DSR-L treatment gave the highest lentil yield, 8.084 t ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
MT DSR -Le0
Outcome
highest yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.084 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MT DSR -L treatment having the highest yield of 8.084 t ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-lentil cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among nutrient schedules, crops had better LAI, CGR and yield in the first year with 100% RDF.

Taxon
cropse0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
LAI, CGR and yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the crops had better LAI, CGR and yield during the first year in the case of 100% RDF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second year, 75% nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + zinc sulphate gave the highest LAI, CGR and yield values.

Taxon
rice-lentilt0
Treatment
75% Nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + Zinc Sulphatee0
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
highest respective valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
second yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but in the second year, 75% Nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + Zinc Sulphate had the highest respective values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1786 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-lentil cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon was marginally improved by both tillage and nutrient treatments.

Taxon
rice-lentilt0
Treatment
tillage and nutrient treatmentse0
Outcome
Soil organic carbone0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
marginallye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon was marginally improved by both tillage and nutrient treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1788–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-lentil cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase activity and microbial count were significantly influenced by tillage and nutrient treatments.

Taxon
rice-lentilt0
Outcome
soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase activity and microbial counte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“soil microbial biomass carbon, dehydrogenase activity and microbial count were significantly influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1982 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-lentil cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of MT DSR-L and 75% nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + zinc sulphate (N5) gave the maximum values for all soil biological parameters.

Taxon
rice-lentilt0
Treatment
MT DSR -L and 75% Nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + Zinc Sulphatee0
Interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
soil biological parameterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of MT DSR -L and 75% Nitrogen + FYM + Azospirillum sp. + Zinc Sulphate (N 5 ) treatment showed the maximum values for all soil biological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1984–2148 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-lentil cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude minimum tillage and integrated nutrient management may be recommended to enhance yield and stability of rice-lentil systems in sandy clay loam soil of a new alluvial zone of eastern India.

Taxon
rice-lentile0
Outcome
enhance the yield and stabilitye0
Setting
sandy clay loam soil of a new alluvial zone of eastern Indiae0

Verbatim

e0

“the practice of minimum tillage and integrated nutrient management may be recommended to enhance the yield and stability of rice-lentil cropping systems in sandy clay loam soil of a new alluvial zone of eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2226–2442 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.