Abstract
A field trial was conducted during Rabi 2020-21 in randomized block design with three replications and seven treatments comprising individual and combined application of various organic and inorganic nutrient sources at Research Farm, MMU Sadopur (Ambala), Haryana. The experiment was intended to evaluate the effect of vermicompost, biofertilizers and inorganic fertilizers applied in chickpea on nutrient uptake and physico-chemical properties of soil pH (8.24). The highest organic carbon (0.58%), electrical conductivity (0.51 dS m-1), particle density (2.50 g/cm3) and porosity (48.47%) along with maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB. Similarly, the nutrient content (N, P and K) was maximum in seed and stover of chickpea harvested from the plots receiving 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB, which was statistically at par with T7 i.e., 2.5 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB. The highest net return was recorded in plots treated with 50% RDF (Recommended dose of fertilizer) + Rhizobium + PSB and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB with a benefit cost ratio (B: C) of 3.2 and 3.1, respectively. However, the seed yield in integrated nutrient management was comparable to recommended dose of chemical fertilizers
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the highest soil organic carbon at 0.58%.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- organic carbone0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.58%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest organic carbon (0.58%), electrical conductivity (0.51 dS m-1), particle density (2.50 g/cm3) and porosity (48.47%) along with maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the highest soil electrical conductivity at 0.51 dS m-1.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- electrical conductivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.51 dS m-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest organic carbon (0.58%), electrical conductivity (0.51 dS m-1), particle density (2.50 g/cm3) and porosity (48.47%) along with maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the highest particle density at 2.50 g/cm3.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- particle densitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.50 g/cm3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest organic carbon (0.58%), electrical conductivity (0.51 dS m-1), particle density (2.50 g/cm3) and porosity (48.47%) along with maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the highest porosity at 48.47%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- porositye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 48.47%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest organic carbon (0.58%), electrical conductivity (0.51 dS m-1), particle density (2.50 g/cm3) and porosity (48.47%) along with maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 gave maximum available soil N at 126.5 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- available Ne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 126.5 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 gave maximum available soil P at 23.2 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 23.2 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 gave maximum available soil K at 98.33 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 98.33 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum available N (126.5 kg ha-1), P (23.2 kg/ha) and K (98.33 kg/ha) were observed in the treatment of T6 i.e., 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea seed and stover N, P and K content was maximum under T6 and statistically at par with T7.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Organ / stage
- seed and stovere0
- Treatment
- 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- nutrient content (N, P and K)e0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- T7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nutrient content (N, P and K) was maximum in seed and stover of chickpea harvested from the plots receiving 3 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB, which was statistically at par with T7 i.e., 2.5 t/ha Vermicompost + Rhizobium + PSB”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50% RDF treatment had a top net return and benefit cost ratio of 3.2.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 50% RDF (Recommended dose of fertilizer) + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest net return was recorded in plots treated with 50% RDF (Recommended dose of fertilizer) + Rhizobium + PSB and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB with a benefit cost ratio (B: C) of 3.2 and 3.1, respectively”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF treatment had a top net return and benefit cost ratio of 3.1.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSBe0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest net return was recorded in plots treated with 50% RDF (Recommended dose of fertilizer) + Rhizobium + PSB and 75% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB with a benefit cost ratio (B: C) of 3.2 and 3.1, respectively”
e1“applied in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management gave seed yield comparable to recommended chemical fertilizer.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- integrated nutrient managemente0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- recommended dose of chemical fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield in integrated nutrient management was comparable to recommended dose of chemical fertilizers”
e1“applied in chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Rhizobium · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →fertilization · soil: physics · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.