Paper · 2023 · Innovations and Food Safety

INFLUENCE OF PLANTING SCHEMES ON THE PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF POTATOES IN THE REPUBLIC OF KHAKASIA

V. V. Chagin; N. V. Gavrilets; S. V. Erbes; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

. The influence of potato planting patterns on yield and quality was revealed in the steppe zone of the Republic of Khakassia on dark chestnut soils. In addition, varieties of Siberian selection of different maturity groups were studied as an object of study: Krasnoyarsk early - early ripening, Tanai - medium before, and Nakra - mid-ripening. The experiments were laid in 2020 - 2022 on light sandy, loamy dark chestnut soils with a humus content of 2.8% at a slightly alkaline pH. The technology recommended for the steppe zone of Khakassia was used for cultivation. Potato planting schemes were selected for cultivation for food and seed purposes. During the years of research, the average monthly air temperatures during the growing season were close to the long-term averages. The amount of precipitation was close to the norm. However, there were also significant excesses (July 2020 - 268%) and half the bars (July 2021). A decrease in the feeding area increased the height of plants due to a lack of light, with a significant reduction in the parameter of the average leaf area to 12.6%. Due to the optimal feeding area choice, the yield increase was from 1.9 to 3.2 t/ha. The variation in the yield between the planting patterns of varieties of different ripeness groups ranged from 22.7 to 30.5%. Statistical calculations showed that the yield value depends on the array by 21.6%, by 28.5% - from the planting pattern and by 22.8% - from the conditions of the growing season. With the decreased distance between plants in a row, dry matter and starch content increased, and the amount of vitamin C in tubers increased. However, the accumulation of nitrates by tubers in all variants of the experiment and all varieties did not exceed 126 mg/kg at the maximum allowable concentration of 250 mg/kg.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smaller feeding area increased plant height.

Treatment
decrease in the feeding areae0
Outcome
height of plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in the feeding area increased the height of plants due to a lack of light, with a significant reduction in the parameter of the average leaf area to 12.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Smaller feeding area significantly reduced average leaf area to 12.6%.

Treatment
decrease in the feeding areae0
Outcome
average leaf areae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
12.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in the feeding area increased the height of plants due to a lack of light, with a significant reduction in the parameter of the average leaf area to 12.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal feeding area increased potato yield by 1.9 to 3.2 t/ha.

Treatment
optimal feeding area choicee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.9 to 3.2 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the optimal feeding area choice, the yield increase was from 1.9 to 3.2 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield varied by 22.7 to 30.5% between planting patterns across variety maturity groups.

Outcome
variation in the yielde0
Value
22.7 to 30.5%e0
Qualifier
between the planting patterns of varieties of different ripeness groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variation in the yield between the planting patterns of varieties of different ripeness groups ranged from 22.7 to 30.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The array accounted for 21.6% of yield variation.

Treatment
arraye0
Outcome
yield valuee0
Value
21.6%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical calculations showed that the yield value depends on the array by 21.6%, by 28.5% - from the planting pattern and by 22.8% - from the conditions of the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern accounted for 28.5% of yield variation.

Treatment
planting patterne0
Outcome
yield valuee0
Value
28.5%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical calculations showed that the yield value depends on the array by 21.6%, by 28.5% - from the planting pattern and by 22.8% - from the conditions of the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing-season conditions accounted for 22.8% of yield variation.

Treatment
conditions of the growing seasone0
Outcome
yield valuee0
Value
22.8%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical calculations showed that the yield value depends on the array by 21.6%, by 28.5% - from the planting pattern and by 22.8% - from the conditions of the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreased spacing increased dry matter and starch content.

Treatment
decreased distance between plants in a rowe0
Outcome
dry matter and starch contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the decreased distance between plants in a row, dry matter and starch content increased, and the amount of vitamin C in tubers increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreased spacing increased tuber vitamin C.

Treatment
decreased distance between plants in a rowe0
Outcome
amount of vitamin C in tuberse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the decreased distance between plants in a row, dry matter and starch content increased, and the amount of vitamin C in tubers increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber nitrates did not exceed 126 mg/kg in any variant or variety.

Outcome
accumulation of nitrates by tuberse0
Direction
did not exceede0
Value
126 mg/kge0
Qualifier
maximum allowable concentration of 250 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of nitrates by tubers in all variants of the experiment and all varieties did not exceed 126 mg/kg at the maximum allowable concentration of 250 mg/kg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1807 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑

infection · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 4 positive, 20 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.