Paper · 2023 · Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture

TECHNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF SPRING TRITICALE GRAIN PRODUCTION, GROWN WITH DIFFERENT DOSES OF NITROGEN FERTILIZERS

V. V. Liubych

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aim. To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain. Methods. Height of stalks was determined at the beginning of tillering stage, during stem elongation, earing and full maturity of spring triticale grain; yield was determined by direct harvesting from certain areas; protein content was measured using the infrared spectroscopy; statistical data processing was carried out using the method of one-way analysis of variance. Results. The height of spring triticale plants varied from 94 to 113 cm depending on the experiment variant. The bending strength was high (9 points). Yield of spring triticale grain significantly increased with the improvement of mineral nutrition. Thus, on average over the three years of research, the application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizer increased it to 6.50–8.36 t/ha or by 14–46% compared to the unfertilized areas (5.71 t/ha). The yield stability index was high – 0.92–0.95. The application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizers increased the protein content of spring triticale grain. On average over the two years of research, it increased from 13.7% without fertilizers to 13.8–15.4% or by 1–12%. The application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers did not change this indicator. The application of high doses of nitrogen fertilizers (120–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients) slightly reduced the stability index of the protein content formation in the grain to 0.87–0.90. In terms of protein yield from the yield of spring triticale grain, the one fertilized with nitrogen fertilizers significantly prevailed unfertilized areas with the stability index of 0.92–0.99. On average over the two years of research, this index increased to 115–506 kg/ha or by 1.1–1.6 (894–1285 kg/ha) compared to the one without fertilizers. The application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers increased the protein yield to 818 kg/ha or by 5%. Conclusions. The height of spring triticale plants varies depending on the fertilizer. The plant height in the phase of full maturity of spring triticale grain varies from 94 to 113 cm depending on the fertilizer used. This indicator is mostly affected by the use of nitrogen fertilizers. On average over two years of research, the application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizer increases grain yield to 6.50–8.36 t/ha or by 14–46% compared to unfertilized areas (5.71 t/ha). Yield stability index is high – 0.92–0.95. Protein content increases from 13.7% without fertilizer to 13.8–15.4% or by 1–12%. The use of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers does not change this indicator. On average over two years of research, the protein yield increases by 115–506 kg/ha or by 1.1–1.6 (894–1285 kg/ha) when applying N30–210 compared to omission of fertilization. Application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers increases protein yield to 818 kg/ha or by 5%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer at 30–210 kg/ha increased spring triticale grain yield to 6.50–8.36 t/ha, or by 14–46%, compared with unfertilized areas.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizere2
Outcome
Yield of spring triticale graine1
Direction
increasede2
Value
6.50–8.36 t/ha or by 14–46%e2
Comparator
unfertilized arease2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of spring triticale grain significantly increased with the improvement of mineral nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–744 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizer increased it to 6.50–8.36 t/ha or by 14–46% compared to the unfertilized areas (5.71 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–963 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield stability index of spring triticale was high, 0.92–0.95.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
yield stability indexe3
Value
0.92–0.95e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“The yield stability index was high – 0.92–0.95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer at 30–210 kg/ha increased spring triticale grain protein content to 13.8–15.4%, or by 1–12%, compared with no fertilizer.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizerse4
Outcome
protein content of spring triticale graine4
Direction
increasede4
Value
13.8–15.4% or by 1–12%e5
Comparator
without fertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“The application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizers increased the protein content of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1145 · show in text ↑
e5

“On average over the two years of research, it increased from 13.7% without fertilizers to 13.8–15.4% or by 1–12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and potassium fertilizers did not change spring triticale grain protein content.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizerse6
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
did not changee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“The application of 30–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients of nitrogen fertilizers increased the protein content of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1145 · show in text ↑
e6

“The application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers did not change this indicator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1346 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen doses of 120–210 kg/ha slightly reduced the stability index of grain protein content formation to 0.87–0.90.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
high doses of nitrogen fertilizers (120–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients)e7
Outcome
stability index of the protein content formation in the graine7
Direction
reducede7
Value
0.87–0.90e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e7

“The application of high doses of nitrogen fertilizers (120–210 kg/ha of primary nutrients) slightly reduced the stability index of the protein content formation in the grain to 0.87–0.90”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-fertilized spring triticale significantly prevailed unfertilized areas in protein yield, with a stability index of 0.92–0.99.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse1
Outcome
protein yielde2
Direction
prevailede1
Value
0.92–0.99e1
Comparator
unfertilized arease1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“the one fertilized with nitrogen fertilizers significantly prevailed unfertilized areas with the stability index of 0.92–0.99”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1729 · show in text ↑
e2

“In terms of protein yield from the yield of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying N30–210 increased spring triticale protein yield by 115–506 kg/ha, or by 1.1–1.6 times, compared with omitting fertilization.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
applying N30–210e1
Outcome
protein yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
115–506 kg/ha or by 1.1–1.6 (894–1285 kg/ha)e1
Comparator
omission of fertilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average over two years of research, the protein yield increases by 115–506 kg/ha or by 1.1–1.6 (894–1285 kg/ha) when applying N30–210 compared to omission of fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2698–2872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus and potassium fertilizers increased spring triticale protein yield to 818 kg/ha, or by 5%.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
Application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizerse1
Outcome
protein yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
818 kg/ha or by 5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers increases protein yield to 818 kg/ha or by 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2874–2971 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers mostly affected spring triticale plant height at full maturity.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse2
Outcome
plant heighte1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plant height in the phase of full maturity of spring triticale grain varies from 94 to 113 cm depending on the fertilizer used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2078–2208 · show in text ↑
e2

“This indicator is mostly affected by the use of nitrogen fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2210–2278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height of spring triticale at full maturity ranged from 94 to 113 cm depending on fertilizer.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
plant heighte1
Value
94 to 113 cme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plant height in the phase of full maturity of spring triticale grain varies from 94 to 113 cm depending on the fertilizer used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2078–2208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring triticale bending strength was high, 9 points.

Taxon
spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
bending strengthe1
Value
9 pointse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine the effect of different doses of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and quality of spring triticale grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bending strength was high (9 points)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–645 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ

98 papers: 85 positive, 13 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.