Paper · 2023 · Karantin i zahist roslin

Effectiveness of graminicide application in chickpea crops in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

R. Hutianskyi

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Goal. To determine the effect of herbicides, in particular graminicides with different active ingredients, on the weediness of crops and the yield of chickpea seeds in the conditions of the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Methods. Field, measuring and weighing, statistical. Results. Under conditions of the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine, 27 species of weed plants were found in chickpea crops (annual cereals — 3 species, annual dicots — 17 species, perennial dicotyledonous — 7 species). Annual cereal weeds dominated in number (76.4%), and annual dicot weeds (44.3%) in terms of raw mass. The highest technical efficiency against annual cereal weeds, when applied during the budding stage of chickpea, was provided by the graminicide Lemur, EC (hyzalofop-P-tefuryl, 40 g/ l) — 1.5 l/ ha (by the number and raw mass of cereals, 99.2 and 98.3%, respectively), and the lowest efficiency was provided by the graminicide Selenite, EC (clethodim, 120 g/ l) — 1.0 l/ ha (79.4 and 71.8%, respectively). Tank mixture of soil herbicides Panda, EC (pendimethalin, 330 g/ l) — 3.5 l/ ha + Steals, EC (flurochloridone, 250 g/ l) — 2.0 l/ ha, which was applied in the pre-emergence period, controlled only the number of annual dicot weeds (technical efficiency was 62.1—79.0%), which was associated with a number of factors (the presence of resistant weed species in the crops, different soil moisture during the application period by years, the use of the minimum recommended doses of herbicides). The studied herbicides did not affect perennial dicot weeds. Combining soil herbicides with graminicides reduced the total number of weeds by 73.2—87.9%, and their raw weight by 22.4—43.0%. The highest economic efficiency (0.28 t/ ha) was provided by the composition of the preparations Panda, EC — 3.5 l/ ha + Steals, EC — 2.0 l/ ha (tank mixture) + Queen Star Max, EC (hyzalofop-P-ethyl, 125 g/ l) — 0.8 l/ ha. Conclusions. In the absence of the effect of the studied herbicides on perennial dicot weeds and the insufficient effect of soil herbicides on annual dicot species, despite the high effectiveness of graminicides against cereals, it was not possible to obtain significant increase in the yield of chickpea seeds (from 0.13 to 0.28 t/ ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lemur applied at the budding stage gave the highest technical efficiency against annual cereal weeds (99.2% by number)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
budding stagee1
Treatment
graminicide Lemur, EC (hyzalofop-P-tefuryl, 40 g/ l) — 1.5 l/ hae1
Interactor
annual cereal weedse1weed
Outcome
technical efficiency against annual cereal weedse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
99.2 and 98.3%e1
Comparator
graminicide Selenite, EC (clethodim, 120 g/ l) — 1.0 l/ hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest technical efficiency against annual cereal weeds, when applied during the budding stage of chickpea, was provided by the graminicide Lemur, EC (hyzalofop-P-tefuryl, 40 g/ l) — 1.5 l/ ha (by the number and raw mass of cereals, 99.2 and 98.3%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–864 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lowest efficiency was provided by the graminicide Selenite, EC (clethodim, 120 g/ l) — 1.0 l/ ha (79.4 and 71.8%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenite applied at 1.0 l/ha gave the lowest technical efficiency against annual cereal weeds (79.4% by number)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
graminicide Selenite, EC (clethodim, 120 g/ l) — 1.0 l/ hae2
Interactor
annual cereal weedse1weed
Outcome
efficiencye2
Direction
loweste2
Value
79.4 and 71.8%e2
Comparator
graminicide Lemur, EC (hyzalofop-P-tefuryl, 40 g/ l) — 1.5 l/ hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest technical efficiency against annual cereal weeds, when applied during the budding stage of chickpea, was provided by the graminicide Lemur, EC (hyzalofop-P-tefuryl, 40 g/ l) — 1.5 l/ ha (by the number and raw mass of cereals, 99.2 and 98.3%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–864 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lowest efficiency was provided by the graminicide Selenite, EC (clethodim, 120 g/ l) — 1.0 l/ ha (79.4 and 71.8%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil herbicide tank mixture Panda + Steals, applied pre-emergence, controlled only annual dicot weeds (technical efficiency 62.1—79.0%)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Tank mixture of soil herbicides Panda, EC (pendimethalin, 330 g/ l) — 3.5 l/ ha + Steals, EC (flurochloridone, 250 g/ l) — 2.0 l/ hae3
Interactor
annual dicot weedse3weed
Outcome
number of annual dicot weedse3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
62.1—79.0%e3
Qualifier
the presence of resistant weed species in the cropse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tank mixture of soil herbicides Panda, EC (pendimethalin, 330 g/ l) — 3.5 l/ ha + Steals, EC (flurochloridone, 250 g/ l) — 2.0 l/ ha, which was applied in the pre-emergence period, controlled only the number of annual dicot weeds (technical efficiency was 62.1—79.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1270 · show in text ↑
e4

“which was associated with a number of factors (the presence of resistant weed species in the crops, different soil moisture during the application period by years, the use of the minimum recommended doses of herbicides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The studied herbicides had no effect on perennial dicot weeds

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
studied herbicidese5
Interactor
perennial dicot weedse5weed
Outcome
perennial dicot weedse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e5

“The studied herbicides did not affect perennial dicot weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining soil herbicides with graminicides reduced the total number of weeds by 73.2—87.9%

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Combining soil herbicides with graminicidese6
Interactor
weedse6weed
Outcome
total number of weedse6
Direction
reducede6
Value
73.2—87.9%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e6

“Combining soil herbicides with graminicides reduced the total number of weeds by 73.2—87.9%, and their raw weight by 22.4—43.0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining soil herbicides with graminicides reduced raw weed weight by 22.4—43.0%

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Combining soil herbicides with graminicidese6
Interactor
weedse6weed
Outcome
raw weighte6
Direction
reducede6
Value
22.4—43.0%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e6

“Combining soil herbicides with graminicides reduced the total number of weeds by 73.2—87.9%, and their raw weight by 22.4—43.0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil herbicide plus graminicide composition gave the highest economic efficiency (0.28 t/ha)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
composition of the preparations Panda, EC — 3.5 l/ ha + Steals, EC — 2.0 l/ ha (tank mixture) + Queen Star Max, EC (hyzalofop-P-ethyl, 125 g/ l) — 0.8 l/ hae7
Outcome
economic efficiencye7
Direction
higheste7
Value
0.28 t/ hae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest economic efficiency (0.28 t/ ha) was provided by the composition of the preparations Panda, EC — 3.5 l/ ha + Steals, EC — 2.0 l/ ha (tank mixture) + Queen Star Max, EC (hyzalofop-P-ethyl, 125 g/ l) — 0.8 l/ ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1905 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-seven weed species were found in chickpea crops

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
weed plantse0weed
Outcome
species of weed plantse0
Value
27 speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“27 species of weed plants were found in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual cereal weeds dominated the weed community in number (76.4%)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
annual cereal weedse0weed
Outcome
Annual cereal weeds dominated in numbere0
Value
76.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Annual cereal weeds dominated in number (76.4%), and annual dicot weeds (44.3%) in terms of raw mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–596 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual dicot weeds accounted for 44.3% of weed raw mass

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
annual dicot weedse0weed
Outcome
raw masse0
Value
44.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Annual cereal weeds dominated in number (76.4%), and annual dicot weeds (44.3%) in terms of raw mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graminicides did not produce a significant increase in chickpea seed yield (0.13 to 0.28 t/ha)

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
graminicidese0
Outcome
yield of chickpea seedse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
from 0.13 to 0.28 t/ hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“graminicide application in chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“despite the high effectiveness of graminicides against cereals, it was not possible to obtain significant increase in the yield of chickpea seeds (from 0.13 to 0.28 t/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2242 · show in text ↑

Panda · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Panda · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

49 papers: 49 positive, 0 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

herbicide · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 74 positive, 1 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.