Paper · 2023 · Viruses

Specific Nucleotides in the Common Region of the Begomovirus Tomato Rugose Mosaic Virus (ToRMV) Are Responsible for the Negative Interference over Tomato Severe Rugose Virus (ToSRV) in Mixed Infection

Angélica M. Nogueira; Tarsiane M. C. Barbosa; Ayane F. F. Quadros; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mixed infection between two or more begomoviruses is commonly found in tomato fields and can affect disease outcomes by increasing symptom severity and viral accumulation compared with single infection. Viruses that affect tomato include tomato severe rugose virus (ToSRV) and tomato rugose mosaic virus (ToRMV). Previous work showed that in mixed infection, ToRMV negatively affects the infectivity and accumulation of ToSRV. ToSRV and ToRMV share a high degree of sequence identity, including cis-elements in the common region (CR) and their specific recognition sites (iteron-related domain, IRD) within the Rep gene. Here, we investigated if divergent sites in the CR and IRD are involved in the interaction between these two begomoviruses. ToSRV clones were constructed containing the same nucleotides as ToRMV in the CR (ToSRV-A(ToR:CR)), IRD (ToSRV-A(ToR:IRD)) and in both regions (ToSRV-A(ToR:CR+IRD)). When plants were co-inoculated with ToRMV and ToSRV-A(ToR:IRD), the infectivity and accumulation of ToSRV were negatively affected. In mixed inoculation of ToRMV with ToSRV-A(ToR:CR), high infectivity of both viruses and high DNA accumulation of ToSRV-A(ToR:CR) were observed. A decrease in viral accumulation was observed in plants inoculated with ToSRV-A(ToR:CR+IRD). These results indicate that differences in the CR, but not the IRD, are responsible for the negative interference of ToRMV on ToSRV.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In tomato co-inoculated with ToRMV and ToSRV-A(ToR:IRD), ToSRV infectivity and accumulation were negatively affected.

Treatment
co-inoculated with ToRMV and ToSRV-A(ToR:IRD)e2
Interactor
ToSRVe2pathogen
Second interactor
ToRMVe2pathogen
Outcome
infectivity and accumulation of ToSRVe2
Direction
negatively affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Viruses that affect tomato include tomato severe rugose virus (ToSRV) and tomato rugose mosaic virus (ToRMV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“When plants were co-inoculated with ToRMV and ToSRV-A(ToR:IRD), the infectivity and accumulation of ToSRV were negatively affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In tomato mixed inoculation of ToRMV with ToSRV-A(ToR:CR) gave high infectivity of both viruses and high ToSRV-A(ToR:CR) DNA accumulation.

Treatment
mixed inoculation of ToRMV with ToSRV-A(ToR:CR)e3
Interactor
ToSRVe3pathogen
Second interactor
ToRMVe3pathogen
Outcome
infectivity of both virusese3
Direction
highe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Viruses that affect tomato include tomato severe rugose virus (ToSRV) and tomato rugose mosaic virus (ToRMV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–311 · show in text ↑
e3

“In mixed inoculation of ToRMV with ToSRV-A(ToR:CR), high infectivity of both viruses and high DNA accumulation of ToSRV-A(ToR:CR) were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In tomato, ToSRV-A(ToR:CR+IRD) inoculation decreased viral accumulation.

Treatment
plants inoculated with ToSRV-A(ToR:CR+IRD)e4
Interactor
ToSRVe4pathogen
Outcome
viral accumulatione4
Direction
decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Viruses that affect tomato include tomato severe rugose virus (ToSRV) and tomato rugose mosaic virus (ToRMV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–311 · show in text ↑
e4

“A decrease in viral accumulation was observed in plants inoculated with ToSRV-A(ToR:CR+IRD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1279 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in the common region, not the IRD, are responsible for the negative interference of ToRMV on ToSRV in tomato.

Interactor
ToRMVe5pathogen
Second interactor
ToSRVe5pathogen
Outcome
negative interferencee5
Qualifier
differences in the CRe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Viruses that affect tomato include tomato severe rugose virus (ToSRV) and tomato rugose mosaic virus (ToRMV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–311 · show in text ↑
e5

“These results indicate that differences in the CR, but not the IRD, are responsible for the negative interference of ToRMV on ToSRV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1412 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.