Abstract
Modern crop production technologies depend on the intensity of soil cultivation. Traditional cultivation methods increase production costs and harm the environment. The research relevance is determined by the need to find effective and environmentally friendly alternative tillage technologies that will reduce the cost of agricultural production and have a positive impact on the environment. The research aims to determine the influence of the soil tillage system on the formation of soybean plant productivity. Research methods: long-term stationary experiment, laboratory determination of soil agrophysical properties, statistical data processing. The field research was carried out at the Agronomic Research Station, a separate subdivision of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, in a stationary experiment of the Department of Agriculture and Herbology. Soybean yields under the No-till system were found to be 22.7% higher than under the conventional system, which in absolute terms was 2.81 t/ha under the No-till system and 2.29 t/ha under the conventional system. No-till provided higher soil moisture content and the share of agronomically valuable aggregates at a higher soil density than the traditional system. In general, the efficiency of moisture use by soybean plants under the shelf tillage system was 16.0% lower compared to the no-till system. The use of the conventional tillage system on average in 2020-2022 led to a decrease in the structural structure of the 0-30 cm soil layer studied by 8-33%. The amount of agronomically valuable aggregates (0.25-10 mm) depended on the tillage system. The No-till system increased the agronomically valuable structure in the 0-10 cm soil layer by 15.5%, the 10-20 cm layer by 10.3% and the 20-30 cm layer by 9.1% compared to the conventional tillage system at the beginning of the growing season and by 4.2%, 7.3% and 4.7%, respectively, at the end of the growing season. The practical significance of the obtained research results is to determine the optimal soil cultivation system for the realisation of the genetic potential of soybean to form its stable productivity
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
No-till soybean yield was 22.7% higher than conventional yield.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- No-till systeme0
- Outcome
- Soybean yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 22.7%e0
- Comparator
- conventional systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean yields under the No-till system were found to be 22.7% higher than under the conventional system”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till soybean yield was 2.81 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“2.81 t/ha under the No-till system”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional soybean yield was 2.29 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“2.29 t/ha under the conventional system”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till produced higher soil moisture content than traditional tillage.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“No-till provided higher soil moisture content and the share of agronomically valuable aggregates at a higher soil density than the traditional system”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till increased the share of agronomically valuable aggregates relative to traditional tillage.
- Treatment
- No-tille0
- Outcome
- share of agronomically valuable aggregatese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional systeme0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“No-till provided higher soil moisture content and the share of agronomically valuable aggregates at a higher soil density than the traditional system”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till had higher soil density than traditional tillage.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“No-till provided higher soil moisture content and the share of agronomically valuable aggregates at a higher soil density than the traditional system”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean moisture-use efficiency under shelf tillage was 16.0% lower than no-till.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- shelf tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- efficiency of moisture usee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 16.0%e0
- Comparator
- no-till systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“efficiency of moisture use by soybean plants under the shelf tillage system was 16.0% lower compared to the no-till system”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage decreased the structure of the 0-30 cm soil layer by 8-33%.
- Treatment
- conventional tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- structural structure of the 0-30 cm soil layere0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 8-33%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“conventional tillage system on average in 2020-2022 led to a decrease in the structural structure of the 0-30 cm soil layer studied by 8-33%”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till increased valuable soil structure in the 0-10 cm layer by 15.5% at season start.
- Treatment
- No-till systeme0
- Outcome
- agronomically valuable structure in the 0-10 cm soil layere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15.5%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“No-till system increased the agronomically valuable structure in the 0-10 cm soil layer by 15.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till increased valuable soil structure in the 10-20 cm layer by 10.3% at season start.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“the 10-20 cm layer by 10.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till increased valuable soil structure in the 20-30 cm layer by 9.1% at season start.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“the 20-30 cm layer by 9.1%”
Claim · model-written summary
At season end, the increase in the 0-10 cm layer was 4.2%.
- Outcome
- agronomically valuable structuree0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 4.2%e0
- Qualifier
- end of the growing seasone0
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“No-till system increased the agronomically valuable structure in the 0-10 cm soil layer by 15.5%, the 10-20 cm layer by 10.3% and the 20-30 cm layer by 9.1% compared to the conventional tillage system at the beginning of the growing season and by 4.2%, 7.3% and 4.7%, respectively, at the end of the growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
At season end, the increase in the 10-20 cm layer was 7.3%.
- Outcome
- agronomically valuable structuree0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 7.3%e0
- Qualifier
- end of the growing seasone0
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“No-till system increased the agronomically valuable structure in the 0-10 cm soil layer by 15.5%, the 10-20 cm layer by 10.3% and the 20-30 cm layer by 9.1% compared to the conventional tillage system at the beginning of the growing season and by 4.2%, 7.3% and 4.7%, respectively, at the end of the growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
At season end, the increase in the 20-30 cm layer was 4.7%.
- Outcome
- agronomically valuable structuree0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 4.7%e0
- Qualifier
- end of the growing seasone0
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“No-till system increased the agronomically valuable structure in the 0-10 cm soil layer by 15.5%, the 10-20 cm layer by 10.3% and the 20-30 cm layer by 9.1% compared to the conventional tillage system at the beginning of the growing season and by 4.2%, 7.3% and 4.7%, respectively, at the end of the growing season”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: grain · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →tillage · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.