Paper · 2023 · Plant and Cell Physiology

Genome-Wide Analysis of Cotton MYB Transcription Factors and the Functional Validation of GhMYB in Response to Drought Stress

Jiuchang Su; Na Zhan; Xiaoru Cheng; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

MYB transcription factors play important roles during abiotic stress responses in plants. However, little is known about the accurate systematic analysis of MYB genes in the four cotton species, Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii. Herein, we performed phylogenetic analysis and showed that cotton MYBs and Arabidopsis MYBs were clustered in the same subfamilies for each species. The identified cotton MYBs were distributed unevenly on chromosomes in various densities for each species, wherein genome-wide tandem and segment duplications were the main driving force of MYB family expansion. Synteny analysis suggested that the abundant collinearity pairs of MYBs were identified between G. hirsutum and the other three species, and that they might have undergone strong purification selection. Characteristics of conserved motifs, along with their consensus sequence, promoter cis elements and gene structure, revealed that MYB proteins might be highly conserved in the same subgroups for each species. Subsequent analysis of differentially expressed genes and expression patterns indicated that most GhMYBs might be involved in response to drought (especially) and salt stress, which was supported by the expression levels of nine GhMYBs using real-time quantitative PCR. Finally, we performed a workflow that combined virus-induced gene silencing and the heterologous transformation of Arabidopsis, which confirmed the positive roles of GhMYBs under drought conditions, as validated by determining the drought-tolerant phenotypes, damage index and/or water loss rate. Collectively, our findings not only expand our understanding of the relationships between evolution and function of MYB genes, but they also provide candidate genes for cotton breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and Arabidopsis MYBs clustered in the same subfamilies.

Gene
MYBse0
Outcome
clustered in the same subfamiliese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton MYBs and Arabidopsis MYBs were clustered in the same subfamilies for each species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton MYBs were unevenly distributed among chromosomes.

Gene
MYBse0
Outcome
distributed unevenly on chromosomese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The identified cotton MYBs were distributed unevenly on chromosomes in various densities for each species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–514 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tandem and segment duplications drove cotton MYB family expansion.

Gene
MYBe0
Outcome
MYB family expansione0
Qualifier
genome-wide tandem and segment duplicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genome-wide tandem and segment duplications were the main driving force of MYB family expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton MYB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abundant MYB collinearity pairs occurred between G. hirsutum and the other three cotton species.

Taxon
G. hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Gene
MYBse0
Outcome
abundant collinearity pairse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“abundant collinearity pairs of MYBs were identified between G. hirsutum and the other three species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–756 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton MYBs may have undergone strong purification selection.

Gene
MYBt0
Outcome
strong purification selectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they might have undergone strong purification selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton MYB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–34 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MYB proteins may be highly conserved within the same cotton subgroups.

Gene
MYB proteinse0
Outcome
highly conserved in the same subgroupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MYB proteins might be highly conserved in the same subgroups for each species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton MYB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–34 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most GhMYBs may participate in drought and salt stress responses.

Taxon
Ghe0
Gene
GhMYBse0
Outcome
response to drought (especially) and salt stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“most GhMYBs might be involved in response to drought (especially) and salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhMYBs had positive roles under drought conditions, supported by drought tolerance, damage and water loss measures.

Treatment
virus-induced gene silencing and the heterologous transformation of Arabidopsise0
Gene
GhMYBse0
Outcome
drought-tolerant phenotypes, damage index and/or water loss ratee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“virus-induced gene silencing and the heterologous transformation of Arabidopsis, which confirmed the positive roles of GhMYBs under drought conditions, as validated by determining the drought-tolerant phenotypes, damage index and/or water loss rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton MYB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–34 · show in text ↑

loss of function · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transgenic · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.