Paper · 2016 · Journal of Oilseeds Research

Influence of phosphorus application on seed yield, quality and phosphorus uptake pattern of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) cultivars

HARIDARSHAN CHOUKSEY; VIRENDER SARDANA; PUSHP SHARMA

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2012-13 at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana on low P soil to study the response of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss] cultivars to applied phosphorus. Application of phosphorus up to 15 kg/ha of P2O5 significantly increased the concentration and uptake of P in plants at all the growth stages, in seed and stover at harvest, and seed yield, oil content, oil yield and protein yield whereas similar increase with application of 30 over 15 kg/ha of P2O5 was significant for P concentration in seed and stover, P uptake at 90 and 120 DAS, stover and total P uptake (seed+ stover) and oil content. Seed yield (1766 kg/ha), oil yield (625 kg/ha) and protein yield (291 kg/ha) produced with application of 30 kg/ha of P2O5 was 9.9, 11.2 and 8.9 per cent, respectivelymore than that produced without application of phosphorus. Among cultivars, NRCHB 601 has significantly out performed all other cultivars for P concentration and uptake, seed-, oil- and protein-yield. Total P uptake at maturity by NRCHB 601 (21.52 kg/ha) was significantly more (18.8-54.8%) than rest of the cultivars. Cultivar NRCDR 2 contained significantly higher oil content (40.2%) than rest of the test cultivars, but, its oil yield was significantly lower than that of NRCHB 601.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 15 kg/ha of P2O5 significantly increased plant P concentration and uptake across growth stages and in seed and stover.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
phosphorus up to 15 kg/ha of P2O5e0
Outcome
concentration and uptake of Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of phosphorus up to 15 kg/ha of P2O5 significantly increased the concentration and uptake of P in plants at all the growth stages, in seed and stover at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 15 kg/ha of P2O5 significantly increased seed yield, oil content, oil yield and protein yield.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
phosphorus up to 15 kg/ha of P2O5e1
Outcome
seed yield, oil content, oil yield and protein yielde0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and seed yield, oil content, oil yield and protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–456 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of phosphorus up to 15 kg/ha of P2O5 significantly increased the concentration and uptake of P in plants at all the growth stages, in seed and stover at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P2O5 from 15 to 30 kg/ha significantly increased P concentration in seed and stover.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
application of 30e0
Outcome
P concentration in seed and stovere0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
15 kg/ha of P2O5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar increase with application of 30 over 15 kg/ha of P2O5 was significant for P concentration in seed and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P2O5 from 15 to 30 kg/ha significantly increased P uptake at 90 and 120 DAS and stover and total uptake.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
application of 30e0
Outcome
P uptake at 90 and 120 DAS, stover and total P uptake (seed+ stover)e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
15 kg/ha of P2O5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar increase with application of 30 over 15 kg/ha of P2O5 was significant for P concentration in seed and stover, P uptake at 90 and 120 DAS, stover and total P uptake (seed+ stover) and oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P2O5 from 15 to 30 kg/ha significantly increased oil content.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
application of 30e0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
15 kg/ha of P2O5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar increase with application of 30 over 15 kg/ha of P2O5 was significant for P concentration in seed and stover, P uptake at 90 and 120 DAS, stover and total P uptake (seed+ stover) and oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg/ha P2O5 seed yield was 1766 kg/ha, 9.9 per cent above no phosphorus.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
application of 30 kg/ha of P2O5e0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
1766 kg/hae0
Comparator
without application of phosphoruse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield (1766 kg/ha), oil yield (625 kg/ha) and protein yield (291 kg/ha) produced with application of 30 kg/ha of P2O5 was 9.9, 11.2 and 8.9 per cent, respectivelymore than that produced without application of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg/ha P2O5 oil yield was 625 kg/ha, 11.2 per cent above no phosphorus.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
application of 30 kg/ha of P2O5e0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
625 kg/hae0
Comparator
without application of phosphoruse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield (1766 kg/ha), oil yield (625 kg/ha) and protein yield (291 kg/ha) produced with application of 30 kg/ha of P2O5 was 9.9, 11.2 and 8.9 per cent, respectivelymore than that produced without application of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg/ha P2O5 protein yield was 291 kg/ha, 8.9 per cent above no phosphorus.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
application of 30 kg/ha of P2O5e0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
291 kg/hae0
Comparator
without application of phosphoruse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield (1766 kg/ha), oil yield (625 kg/ha) and protein yield (291 kg/ha) produced with application of 30 kg/ha of P2O5 was 9.9, 11.2 and 8.9 per cent, respectivelymore than that produced without application of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NRCHB 601 significantly outperformed other cultivars in P concentration and uptake and seed, oil and protein yield.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Material
NRCHB 601e0
Outcome
P concentration and uptake, seed-, oil- and protein-yielde0
Direction
out performede0
Comparator
all other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among cultivars, NRCHB 601 has significantly out performed all other cultivars for P concentration and uptake, seed-, oil- and protein-yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NRCHB 601 total P uptake at maturity was 21.52 kg/ha, significantly greater than other cultivars.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Material
NRCHB 601e0
Outcome
Total P uptake at maturitye0
Direction
moree0
Value
21.52 kg/hae0
Comparator
rest of the cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total P uptake at maturity by NRCHB 601 (21.52 kg/ha) was significantly more (18.8-54.8%) than rest of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NRCDR 2 had significantly higher oil content of 40.2% than the other cultivars.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Material
NRCDR 2e0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
40.2%e0
Comparator
rest of the test cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar NRCDR 2 contained significantly higher oil content (40.2%) than rest of the test cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NRCDR 2 oil yield was significantly lower than NRCHB 601.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Material
NRCDR 2e1
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NRCHB 601e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its oil yield was significantly lower than that of NRCHB 601”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivar NRCDR 2 contained significantly higher oil content (40.2%) than rest of the test cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

31 papers: 31 positive, 0 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.