Paper · 2020 · Journal of Oilseeds Research

Yield, nutrient uptake and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) influenced by nutrient doses and planting geometry under new alluvial zone of West Bengal

DHIMAN MUKHERJEE

20
claims
41
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2017-19 to study the effect of different doses of nutrients and planting geometries on the performance ofIndian mustard under new alluvial zone ofWest Bengal. The field experiment was conducted in split plot design with three replications, having twenty treatment combinations of five nutrient doses in main plot and four crop geometries in subplot. Seed yield (1751 kg/ha) of Indian mustard with 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively (125 % RDF) was at par with 60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 100% RDF (1674 kg/ha) and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 150 % RDF (1733 kg/ha) and significantly higher than 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 75 % RDF. Application of 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively registered 42.5 % more stover yield over 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and was significantly superior to all lower doses of nutrients. Application of 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively resulted in higher oil content than other nutrient doses. Highest protein content obtained with the 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively was significantly higher than 30:20:20 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively. Highest oil and protein yield registered with application of 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively were at par with the 60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively for oil yield and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively for protein yield. Economics revealed that application of 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively gave maximum net return (` 43,250/ha) and B:C ratio of 3.01. The highest seed yield obtained with the 25 x 20 cm spacing (1644 kg/ha) was significantly higher than all other treatments of planting geometry. This treatment registered 24.2 % more seed yield over 25 x 15 cm planting geometry. Plant spacing of 25 x 20 cm registered more stover yield and showed parity with 30 x 15 cm spacing. Closer spacing (25 x 20 cm and 25 x 15 cm) resulted in significantly higher oil content over all other crop geometries. Planting geometry of 25 x 20 cm registered highest oil yield and was comparable only with 30 x 15 cm. However, highest protein yield observed with the 30 x 30 cm spacing was on par with 25 x 20 cm and 30 x 20 cm plant spacing. Plant spacing of 25 x 20 cm gave highest net return (`43,260). However, maximum benefit: cost ratio (3.51) was recorded with the plant spacing of 30 x 15 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDF (75:50:50) seed yield was at par with 100% RDF (60:40:40) of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye1
Outcome
Seed yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Value
1751 kg/hae1
Comparator
60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed yield (1751 kg/ha) of Indian mustard with 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively (125 % RDF) was at par with 60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 100% RDF (1674 kg/ha) and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 150 % RDF (1733 kg/ha) and significantly higher than 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 75 % RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125% RDF seed yield was significantly higher than at 75% RDF (45:30:30).

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye1
Outcome
Seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed yield (1751 kg/ha) of Indian mustard with 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively (125 % RDF) was at par with 60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 100% RDF (1674 kg/ha) and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 150 % RDF (1733 kg/ha) and significantly higher than 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively i.e. 75 % RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150% RDF (90:60:60) stover yield was 42.5% higher than at 45:30:30 and significantly superior to all lower doses.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye2
Outcome
stover yielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
42.5 %e2
Comparator
45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively registered 42.5 % more stover yield over 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and was significantly superior to all lower doses of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45:30:30 nutrient dose gave higher oil content than other nutrient doses in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye3
Outcome
oil contente3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other nutrient dosese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively resulted in higher oil content than other nutrient doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75:50:50 nutrient dose gave significantly higher protein content than 30:20:20 and 45:30:30.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye4
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
30:20:20 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest protein content obtained with the 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively was significantly higher than 30:20:20 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and 45:30:30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75:50:50 nutrient dose gave oil yield at par with 60:40:40 and 90:60:60.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye5
Outcome
oil yielde5
Direction
at pare5
Comparator
60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“Highest oil and protein yield registered with application of 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively were at par with the 60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively for oil yield and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively for protein yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75:50:50 nutrient dose gave protein yield at par with 90:60:60.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye5
Outcome
protein yielde5
Direction
at pare5
Comparator
90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“Highest oil and protein yield registered with application of 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively were at par with the 60:40:40 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively for oil yield and 90:60:60 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively for protein yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1591 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75:50:50 nutrient dose gave the maximum net return of 43,250/ha.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye6
Outcome
net returne6
Direction
maximume6
Value
43,250/hae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“Economics revealed that application of 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively gave maximum net return (` 43,250/ha) and B:C ratio of 3.01.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1736 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75:50:50 nutrient dose gave a B:C ratio of 3.01.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectivelye6
Outcome
B:C ratioe6
Value
3.01e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“Economics revealed that application of 75:50:50 kg N, P2O5 and K2O/ha, respectively gave maximum net return (` 43,250/ha) and B:C ratio of 3.01.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield with 25 x 20 cm spacing was significantly higher (1644 kg/ha) than all other planting geometries.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
25 x 20 cm spacinge7
Outcome
seed yielde7
Direction
highere7
Value
1644 kg/hae7
Comparator
all other treatments of planting geometrye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest seed yield obtained with the 25 x 20 cm spacing (1644 kg/ha) was significantly higher than all other treatments of planting geometry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 x 20 cm spacing gave 24.2% more seed yield than 25 x 15 cm.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
25 x 20 cm spacinge7
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
24.2 %e0
Comparator
25 x 15 cm planting geometrye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest seed yield obtained with the 25 x 20 cm spacing (1644 kg/ha) was significantly higher than all other treatments of planting geometry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1882 · show in text ↑
e0

“This treatment registered 24.2 % more seed yield over 25 x 15 cm planting geometry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 x 20 cm spacing gave more stover yield in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
25 x 20 cme1
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant spacing of 25 x 20 cm registered more stover yield and showed parity with 30 x 15 cm spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 x 20 cm spacing gave stover yield at parity with 30 x 15 cm spacing.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
25 x 20 cme1
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
paritye1
Comparator
30 x 15 cm spacinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant spacing of 25 x 20 cm registered more stover yield and showed parity with 30 x 15 cm spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing (25 x 20 and 25 x 15 cm) gave significantly higher oil content than all other crop geometries.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (25 x 20 cm and 25 x 15 cm)e2
Outcome
oil contente2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
all other crop geometriese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Closer spacing (25 x 20 cm and 25 x 15 cm) resulted in significantly higher oil content over all other crop geometries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 x 20 cm spacing gave the highest oil yield in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
25 x 20 cme3
Outcome
oil yielde3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“Planting geometry of 25 x 20 cm registered highest oil yield and was comparable only with 30 x 15 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 x 20 cm spacing gave oil yield comparable only with 30 x 15 cm spacing.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
25 x 20 cme3
Outcome
oil yielde3
Direction
comparablee3
Comparator
30 x 15 cme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“Planting geometry of 25 x 20 cm registered highest oil yield and was comparable only with 30 x 15 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 x 30 cm spacing gave the highest protein yield in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
30 x 30 cm spacinge4
Outcome
protein yielde4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, highest protein yield observed with the 30 x 30 cm spacing was on par with 25 x 20 cm and 30 x 20 cm plant spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2289–2413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein yield at 30 x 30 cm spacing was on par with 25 x 20 cm and 30 x 20 cm spacing.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
30 x 30 cm spacinge4
Outcome
protein yielde4
Direction
on pare4
Comparator
25 x 20 cm and 30 x 20 cm plant spacinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, highest protein yield observed with the 30 x 30 cm spacing was on par with 25 x 20 cm and 30 x 20 cm plant spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2289–2413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 x 20 cm spacing gave the highest net return (43,260) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
25 x 20 cme5
Outcome
net returne5
Direction
higheste5
Value
43,260e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant spacing of 25 x 20 cm gave highest net return (`43,260).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2414–2476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 x 15 cm spacing gave the maximum benefit: cost ratio of 3.51.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
30 x 15 cme6
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe6
Direction
maximume6
Value
3.51e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, maximum benefit: cost ratio (3.51) was recorded with the plant spacing of 30 x 15 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2477–2571 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

density · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

density · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

31 papers: 31 positive, 0 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.