Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of plant geometry, nitrogen level and antitranspirants on physiological growth, yield attributes, WUE and economics of mustard (Brassica juncea) under semi-arid conditions of western Uttar Pradesh

Krishna Kumar; Yogesh Kumar; Nirmal Kumar Katiyar

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) season of two consecutive years sandy loam soil using three type crop geometry (45 x 10 cm, 30+60x10 cm and 45x20 cm) three nitrogen levels (0, 40 and 80 kgha-1) and four antitranspirants treatments (Control, Phenyl mercuric acetate (PMA) @ 250 PPM, Kaoline (6%) and PMA + Kaoline) revealed that plant height, protein content, biological yield, seed yield, stover yield, net returns, benefit: cost ratio significantly higher in paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm crop geometry but primary and secondary branches plant-1, dry weight plant-1, number of siliquae plant-1, weight of siliquae plant-1, grain yield plant-1, 1000-seed weight higher in 45x20 cm plant geometry, WUE and oil content were not affected by different plant geometry. Physiological growth and yield component, quality and quantity of mustard were higher in maximum nitrogen. Application of PMA + Kaoline received higher crop attributes, yields, returns, and quality of Indian mustard but percent of oil content, protein content and soil moisture had not affected by using of different antitranspirants. The higher dose of nitrogen @ 80 kgha-1 at paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm with application of combined spray of PMA+Kaoline at 45 and 90 days after sowing increased grain and stover yields maximum economic returns and higher content is Indian mustard.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row spacing of 30+60x10 cm significantly raised plant height, protein content, yields and economic returns.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm crop geometrye0
Outcome
plant height, protein content, biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, protein content, biological yield, seed yield, stover yield, net returns, benefit: cost ratio significantly higher in paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm crop geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row spacing significantly raised seed and stover yields.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm crop geometrye0
Outcome
seed yield, stover yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield, stover yield, net returns, benefit: cost ratio significantly higher in paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm crop geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired-row spacing significantly improved net returns and benefit:cost ratio.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm crop geometrye0
Outcome
net returns, benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“net returns, benefit: cost ratio significantly higher in paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm crop geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45x20 cm geometry raised branches, dry weight and siliqua traits.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
45x20 cm plant geometrye0
Outcome
primary and secondary branches plant-1, dry weight plant-1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“primary and secondary branches plant-1, dry weight plant-1, number of siliquae plant-1, weight of siliquae plant-1, grain yield plant-1, 1000-seed weight higher in 45x20 cm plant geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45x20 cm geometry raised siliqua number, siliqua weight and grain yield per plant.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
45x20 cm plant geometrye0
Outcome
number of siliquae plant-1, weight of siliquae plant-1, grain yield plant-1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of siliquae plant-1, weight of siliquae plant-1, grain yield plant-1, 1000-seed weight higher in 45x20 cm plant geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45x20 cm geometry raised 1000-seed weight.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
45x20 cm plant geometrye0
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“1000-seed weight higher in 45x20 cm plant geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant geometry did not affect water-use efficiency or oil content.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
different plant geometrye0
Outcome
WUE and oil contente0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“WUE and oil content were not affected by different plant geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum nitrogen raised physiological growth, yield components, quality and quantity.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
maximum nitrogene0
Outcome
Physiological growth and yield component, qualitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Physiological growth and yield component, quality and quantity of mustard were higher in maximum nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PMA plus kaoline raised crop attributes, yields, returns and quality.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
PMA + Kaolinee0
Outcome
crop attributes, yields, returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PMA + Kaoline received higher crop attributes, yields, returns, and quality of Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antitranspirants did not affect oil content, protein content or soil moisture.

Taxon
mustardt0
Treatment
different antitranspirantse0
Outcome
percent of oil content, protein content and soil moisturee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“percent of oil content, protein content and soil moisture had not affected by using of different antitranspirants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining 80 kg nitrogen, paired rows and PMA plus kaoline gave maximal grain and stover yields and returns.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
nitrogen @ 80 kgha-1 at paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm with application of combined spray of PMA+Kaoline at 45 and 90 days after sowinge0
Outcome
grain and stover yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher dose of nitrogen @ 80 kgha-1 at paired row spacing of 30+60x10 cm with application of combined spray of PMA+Kaoline at 45 and 90 days after sowing increased grain and stover yields maximum economic returns and higher content is Indian mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1382 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

application · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

density · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.