Claim · model-written summary
Plant geometry did not affect water-use efficiency or oil content.
- Taxon
- mustardt0
- Treatment
- different plant geometrye0
- Outcome
- WUE and oil contente0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“WUE and oil content were not affected by different plant geometry”
t0“mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Title
Krishna Kumar; Yogesh Kumar; Nirmal Kumar Katiyar Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Paired-row spacing of 30+60x10 cm significantly raised plant height, protein content, yields and economic returns.
- Intervention effect Paired-row spacing significantly raised seed and stover yields.
- Intervention effect Paired-row spacing significantly improved net returns and benefit:cost ratio.
- Intervention effect The 45x20 cm geometry raised branches, dry weight and siliqua traits.
- Intervention effect The 45x20 cm geometry raised siliqua number, siliqua weight and grain yield per plant.
- Intervention effect The 45x20 cm geometry raised 1000-seed weight.
- Intervention effect Maximum nitrogen raised physiological growth, yield components, quality and quantity.
- Intervention effect PMA plus kaoline raised crop attributes, yields, returns and quality.
- Intervention effect Antitranspirants did not affect oil content, protein content or soil moisture.
- Intervention effect Combining 80 kg nitrogen, paired rows and PMA plus kaoline gave maximal grain and stover yields and returns.