Paper · 2023 · The Science of The Total Environment

Linking the use of reclaimed water to indicators of crop stress by metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses. A tool to compare water irrigation quality

Sylvia Mansilla; Mònica Escolà; Benjamin Piña; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The occurrence of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) or heavy metals in reclaimed water used for agricultural irrigation may affect crop morphology and physiology. Here, we analyzed lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) grown in outdoor lysimeters and irrigated with either tap water, used as a control, or reclaimed water: CAS-reclaimed water, an effluent from a conventional activated sludge system (CAS) followed by chlorination and sand filtration, or MBR-reclaimed water, an effluent from a membrane biological reactor (MBR). Chemical analyses identified seven CECs in the reclaimed waters, but only two of them were detected in lettuce (carbamazepine and azithromycin). Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed that irrigation with reclaimed water increased the concentrations of several crop metabolites (5-oxoproline, leucine, isoleucine, and fumarate) and of transcripts codifying for the plant stress-related genes Heat-Shock Protein 70 ( HSP70 ) and Manganese Superoxide Dismutase ( MnSOD ). In both cases, MBR-water elicited the strongest response in lettuce, perhaps related to its comparatively high sodium adsorption ratio (4.5), rather than to its content in CECs or heavy metals. Our study indicates that crop metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles depend on the composition of irrigating water and that they could be used for testing the impact of water quality in agriculture. • The occurrence of CECs was similar in both reclaimed waters (CAS or MBR effluents). • CAS-reclaimed water irrigation resulted in a greater occurrence of CECs in lettuce. • Plant metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis showed no effect of CECs. • Salinity was the most relevant factor driving plant changes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbamazepine and azithromycin were detected in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
carbamazepine and azithromycine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only two of them were detected in lettuce (carbamazepine and azithromycin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reclaimed water increased 5-oxoproline, leucine, and isoleucine concentrations.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
irrigation with reclaimed watere0
Outcome
5-oxoproline, leucine, isoleucinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation with reclaimed water increased the concentrations of several crop metabolites (5-oxoproline, leucine, isoleucine, and fumarate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) grown in outdoor lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reclaimed water increased fumarate concentration.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
irrigation with reclaimed watere0
Outcome
fumaratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation with reclaimed water increased the concentrations of several crop metabolites (5-oxoproline, leucine, isoleucine, and fumarate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) grown in outdoor lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reclaimed water increased HSP70 and MnSOD transcripts.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
irrigation with reclaimed watere0
Gene
HSP70e0
Outcome
transcripts codifying for the plant stress-related genese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation with reclaimed water increased the concentrations of several crop metabolites (5-oxoproline, leucine, isoleucine, and fumarate) and of transcripts codifying for the plant stress-related genes Heat-Shock Protein 70 ( HSP70 ) and Manganese Superoxide Dismutase ( MnSOD )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) grown in outdoor lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MBR water elicited the strongest lettuce response.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
MBR-watere0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
strongeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MBR-water elicited the strongest response in lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAS reclaimed water led to greater contaminant occurrence in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
CAS-reclaimed water irrigatione0
Outcome
occurrence of CECs in lettucee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAS-reclaimed water irrigation resulted in a greater occurrence of CECs in lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses showed no CEC effect.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
no effect of CECse0
Direction
no effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis showed no effect of CECs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) grown in outdoor lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–241 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity was the most relevant driver of plant changes.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
plant changese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity was the most relevant factor driving plant changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) grown in outdoor lysimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–241 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.