Paper · 2023 · European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences

Efficacy of Vegetables Intercropping in Mulberry on Sericulture Productivity and Economy

Md. Shoriful Islam; Faruque Ahmed; Md. Mostafizur Rahman

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out in three (03) areas viz: experimental field of Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute (BSRTI), Rajshahi, 05 farmers field of Bholahat, Chapainawabganj and 05 farmers of Paba, Rajshahi during 2020–2022. The objective of this research was to assess the effect of vegetables intercropping in mulberry garden on sericulture productivity and economy. Randomized completely block design (RCBD) with 3 replications and 7 treatments which includes, T0 = Sole mulberry (Control) T1 = Mulberry + Potato, T2 = Mulberry + Cabbage, T3 = Mulberry + Cauliflower, T4 = Mulberry + Red amaranth, T5 = Mulberry + Spinach and T6 = Mulberry + Data shak. The growth and yield parameters of mulberry viz average branch number per plant, total leaf number per plant, total branches height per plant (cm), nodes per meter per plant, length of longest shoot (cm), leaf present per branch, 10 leaves area (cm2), total leaf weight per plant (g), total shoots weight per plant (g) and total leaf yield/ha/crop (mt) were higher in T1 (10.89, 1223.35, 753.12, 23.03, 118.16, 20.58, 537.98, 833.35, 402.84 and 10.37) followed by other treatments except control (12.3, 1365.77, 768.82, 23.62, 122.5, 23, 572.92, 901.03, 414.76 and 10.82), respectively. Leaf quality viz moisture, total chlorophyll, crude protein, total sugar, reducing sugar and mineral percentage were significantly higher in T3 (75.7, 38.8, 20.85, 6.48, 4.1 and 12.71) respectively over the T6 (74.86, 38.05, 19.61, 5.59, 3.12 and 11.1). The silk cocoon attributes like weight of 15 larvae (g), single cocoon weight (g), shell weight (g), cocoon shell ratio, highest filament length (m), renditta and cocoon productivity/100 dfls (kg) were higher also in T3 (53.46, 32.41, 0.21, 19.85, 977.84, 11.1 and 70.66) as compared to T6 (51.48, 31.42, 0.18, 18.24, 966.04, 12.31 and 69.24), respectively. The growing of Cauliflower as an intercrop was given maximum B: C (2.31) due to expansion soil fertility, higher leaf yield (except control), leaf quality, cocoon yield and additional income paralleled with other intercrops (cabbage-2.09, red amaranth-2.05, spinach-1.67, potato-1.49, sole mulberry-1.34 and data shak-1.22).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato intercropping gave higher mulberry growth and yield metrics than other intercrops.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and yield parameters of mulberry viz average branch number per plant, total leaf number per plant, total branches height per plant (cm), nodes per meter per plant, length of longest shoot (cm), leaf present per branch, 10 leaves area (cm2), total leaf weight per plant (g), total shoots weight per plant (g) and total leaf yield/ha/crop (mt) were higher in T1 (10.89, 1223.35, 753.12, 23.03, 118.16, 20.58, 537.98, 833.35, 402.84 and 10.37) followed by other treatments except control (12.3, 1365.77, 768.82, 23.62, 122.5, 23, 572.92, 901.03, 414.76 and 10.82), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower intercropping increased mulberry leaf quality relative to data shak.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
Leaf qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T6e0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf quality viz moisture, total chlorophyll, crude protein, total sugar, reducing sugar and mineral percentage were significantly higher in T3 (75.7, 38.8, 20.85, 6.48, 4.1 and 12.71) respectively over the T6 (74.86, 38.05, 19.61, 5.59, 3.12 and 11.1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower intercropping improved cocoon attributes relative to data shak.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
silk cocoon attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T6e0

Verbatim

e0

“The silk cocoon attributes like weight of 15 larvae (g), single cocoon weight (g), shell weight (g), cocoon shell ratio, highest filament length (m), renditta and cocoon productivity/100 dfls (kg) were higher also in T3 (53.46, 32.41, 0.21, 19.85, 977.84, 11.1 and 70.66) as compared to T6 (51.48, 31.42, 0.18, 18.24, 966.04, 12.31 and 69.24), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower intercropping gave the maximum benefit to cost ratio.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
Cauliflower as an intercrope0
Outcome
B: Ce0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.31e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growing of Cauliflower as an intercrop was given maximum B: C (2.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.