Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation from rice cultivation using alternate wetting and drying and rice straw biochar in Thailand

Patikorn Sriphirom; Benjamas Rossopa

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water usage optimization in rice cultivation is challenging for many agricultural countries, including Thailand, who have set goals of reaching net zero emissions and coping with droughts caused by climate change. Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and biochar application are possible practices for achieving cleaner rice production through reduction of GHG emissions and water consumption. However, these methods’ potential varies by site, especially in areas with limited control of water levels. This study assessed the effects of AWD at different drying levels (10, 15, and 20 cm below the soil surface) and rice straw biochar on GHG emissions, yield production, water use, soil characteristics, and economic aspects. This study was conducted over two rice cultivation seasons: a major season in 2022 and a second season in 2023 at a field in Kalasin Province, northeastern Thailand. Using AWD and biochar reduced annual GHG emissions by 48.2% and 8.01%, respectively. Deeper drying levels of AWD showed greater mitigation potential than shallow levels. The combination of AWD and biochar had additional potential for GHG mitigation, however, this impact did not show statistical change as compared to their separate potentials. The adoption of AWD and biochar could also maintain the amount of rice yield compared to traditional practice. All levels of AWD saved irrigation water consumption by an average of 16.8% per season; the highest potential was observed in AWD at 10 cm below the soil surface. Biochar improved soil health after two seasons by enhancing soil pH and organic carbon sequestration. The combination of AWD and biochar did not additionally augment the capacity in water saving of AWD or soil improvement of biochar. The AWD water regime also did not increase net profits, while biochar decreased net profits due to the required investment in biochar production. Using AWD is a feasible way to mitigate GHG emissions and save water without affecting rice productivity and net profits in northeastern Thailand.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD reduced annual GHG emissions by 48.2% in rice cultivation in Thailand.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
annual GHG emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.2%e0
Setting
Kalasin Province, northeastern Thailande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Using AWD and biochar reduced annual GHG emissions by 48.2% and 8.01%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study was conducted over two rice cultivation seasons: a major season in 2022 and a second season in 2023 at a field in Kalasin Province, northeastern Thailand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar reduced annual GHG emissions by 8.01% in rice cultivation in Thailand.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
annual GHG emissionse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.01%e0
Setting
Kalasin Province, northeastern Thailande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Using AWD and biochar reduced annual GHG emissions by 48.2% and 8.01%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study was conducted over two rice cultivation seasons: a major season in 2022 and a second season in 2023 at a field in Kalasin Province, northeastern Thailand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deeper AWD drying levels showed greater GHG mitigation potential than shallow levels.

Treatment
drying levels of AWDe0
Outcome
mitigation potentiale0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
shallow levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Deeper drying levels of AWD showed greater mitigation potential than shallow levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of AWD and biochar gave no statistically significant additional GHG mitigation over their separate potentials.

Treatment
combination of AWD and biochare0
Outcome
additional potential for GHG mitigatione0
Direction
did not show statistical changee0
Comparator
their separate potentialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of AWD and biochar had additional potential for GHG mitigation, however, this impact did not show statistical change as compared to their separate potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The adoption of AWD and biochar maintained the amount of rice yield compared with traditional practice.

Treatment
adoption of AWD and biochare0
Outcome
amount of rice yielde0
Direction
maintaine0
Comparator
traditional practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of AWD and biochar could also maintain the amount of rice yield compared to traditional practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All levels of AWD saved irrigation water consumption by an average of 16.8% per season.

Treatment
All levels of AWDe0
Outcome
irrigation water consumptione0
Direction
savede0
Value
16.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“All levels of AWD saved irrigation water consumption by an average of 16.8% per season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD at 10 cm below the soil surface showed the highest water-saving potential.

Treatment
AWD at 10 cm below the soil surfacee0
Outcome
potentiale0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest potential was observed in AWD at 10 cm below the soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar improved soil pH and organic carbon sequestration after two seasons.

Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
soil pH and organic carbon sequestratione0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
after two seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Biochar improved soil health after two seasons by enhancing soil pH and organic carbon sequestration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of AWD and biochar did not additionally increase water saving of AWD or soil improvement of biochar.

Treatment
combination of AWD and biochare0
Outcome
capacity in water saving of AWD or soil improvement of biochare0
Direction
did not additionally augmente0
Comparator
AWDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of AWD and biochar did not additionally augment the capacity in water saving of AWD or soil improvement of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AWD water regime did not increase net profits.

Treatment
AWD water regimee0
Outcome
net profitse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The AWD water regime also did not increase net profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar decreased net profits because of the required investment in biochar production.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
net profitse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
due to the required investment in biochar productione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“biochar decreased net profits due to the required investment in biochar production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–1939 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Using AWD is a feasible way to mitigate GHG emissions and save water without reducing rice productivity or net profits in northeastern Thailand.

Outcome
a feasible way to mitigate GHG emissions and save watere0
Setting
northeastern Thailande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using AWD is a feasible way to mitigate GHG emissions and save water without affecting rice productivity and net profits in northeastern Thailand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–2086 · show in text ↑

biochar · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

biochar · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 44 positive, 2 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 44 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 109 positive, 18 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

biochar · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 135 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 135 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.