Claim · model-written summary
All levels of AWD saved irrigation water consumption by an average of 16.8% per season.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- All levels of AWDe0
- Outcome
- irrigation water consumptione0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 16.8%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rice cultivation”
e0“All levels of AWD saved irrigation water consumption by an average of 16.8% per season”
Title
Patikorn Sriphirom; Benjamas Rossopa Agricultural Water Management 2023. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108586
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect AWD reduced annual GHG emissions by 48.2% in rice cultivation in Thailand.
- Intervention effect Biochar reduced annual GHG emissions by 8.01% in rice cultivation in Thailand.
- Intervention effect Deeper AWD drying levels showed greater GHG mitigation potential than shallow levels.
- Intervention effect The combination of AWD and biochar gave no statistically significant additional GHG mitigation over their separate potentials.
- Intervention effect The adoption of AWD and biochar maintained the amount of rice yield compared with traditional practice.
- Intervention effect AWD at 10 cm below the soil surface showed the highest water-saving potential.
- Intervention effect Biochar improved soil pH and organic carbon sequestration after two seasons.
- Intervention effect The combination of AWD and biochar did not additionally increase water saving of AWD or soil improvement of biochar.
- Intervention effect The AWD water regime did not increase net profits.
- Intervention effect Biochar decreased net profits because of the required investment in biochar production.
- Recommendation Using AWD is a feasible way to mitigate GHG emissions and save water without reducing rice productivity or net profits in northeastern Thailand.