Abstract
Two separate experiments were conducted in the field to examine the effectiveness of clothianidin 50 WDG against thrips and mealybugs that were infesting grapevines. The findings highlighted that applying clothianidin 50 WDG @ 1000 g ha-1 proved highly efficient in curbing the population of the sucking pests, outperforming lower doses of the compound. Following two rounds of soil drenching spaced 14 days apart, there was an average reduction of 76.63% for thrips and 78.09% for mealybugs. Other concentrations of clothianidin 50 WDG (600, 500 and 400 g ha-1) demonstrated significant reductions in the populations of thrips and mealybugs, exhibiting a similar level of efficacy as the standard check (Methomyl 40 SP and Buprofezin 25 SC) in all field experiments. Notably, no signs of harm to the grapevine were observed at any of the tested doses. Clothianidin 50 WDG @ 1000 g ha-1 resulted in the highest grape yield, producing 14.25 and 8.94 kg vine-1 at Madhampatti and Kalampalayam, respectively. Throughout the clothianidin 50 WDG treatment plots, the presence of natural enemies was noted and their activity remained unaffected, indicating no adverse impact on the natural enemy population.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Clothianidin 50 WDG at 1000 g ha-1 was highly efficient in reducing sucking pest populations in grapevine, outperforming lower doses.
- Treatment
- clothianidin 50 WDG @ 1000 g ha-1e1
- Interactor
- sucking pestse1pest
- Outcome
- population of the sucking pestse1
- Direction
- curbinge1
- Comparator
- lower doses of the compounde1
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two separate experiments were conducted in the field to examine the effectiveness of clothianidin 50 WDG against thrips and mealybugs that were infesting grapevines”
e1“applying clothianidin 50 WDG @ 1000 g ha-1 proved highly efficient in curbing the population of the sucking pests, outperforming lower doses of the compound”
Claim · model-written summary
After two soil drenchings, clothianidin 50 WDG reduced thrips by an average of 76.63%.
ThripsOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two separate experiments were conducted in the field to examine the effectiveness of clothianidin 50 WDG against thrips and mealybugs that were infesting grapevines”
e2“there was an average reduction of 76.63% for thrips and 78.09% for mealybugs”
e3“Following two rounds of soil drenching spaced 14 days apart”
Claim · model-written summary
After two soil drenchings, clothianidin 50 WDG reduced mealybugs by an average of 78.09%.
- Treatment
- soil drenchinge3
- Interactor
- mealybugsPseudococcidaee2pest
- Outcome
- average reductione2
- Value
- 78.09%e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two separate experiments were conducted in the field to examine the effectiveness of clothianidin 50 WDG against thrips and mealybugs that were infesting grapevines”
e2“there was an average reduction of 76.63% for thrips and 78.09% for mealybugs”
e3“Following two rounds of soil drenching spaced 14 days apart”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower concentrations of clothianidin 50 WDG significantly reduced thrips and mealybugs, with efficacy similar to the standard check.
- Treatment
- clothianidin 50 WDG (600, 500 and 400 g ha-1)e4
- Second interactor
- mealybugsPseudococcidaee4pest
- Outcome
- populations of thrips and mealybugse4
- Direction
- significant reductionse4
- Comparator
- standard check (Methomyl 40 SP and Buprofezin 25 SC)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two separate experiments were conducted in the field to examine the effectiveness of clothianidin 50 WDG against thrips and mealybugs that were infesting grapevines”
e4“Other concentrations of clothianidin 50 WDG (600, 500 and 400 g ha-1) demonstrated significant reductions in the populations of thrips and mealybugs, exhibiting a similar level of efficacy as the standard check (Methomyl 40 SP and Buprofezin 25 SC)”
Claim · model-written summary
No signs of harm to the grapevine were observed at any tested dose of clothianidin 50 WDG.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“no signs of harm to the grapevine were observed at any of the tested doses”
Claim · model-written summary
Clothianidin 50 WDG at 1000 g ha-1 gave the highest grape yield, 14.25 and 8.94 kg vine-1 at Madhampatti and Kalampalayam.
- Treatment
- Clothianidin 50 WDG @ 1000 g ha-1e6
- Outcome
- grape yielde6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Value
- 14.25 and 8.94 kg vine-1e6
- Setting
- Madhampatti and Kalampalayame6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two separate experiments were conducted in the field to examine the effectiveness of clothianidin 50 WDG against thrips and mealybugs that were infesting grapevines”
e6“Clothianidin 50 WDG @ 1000 g ha-1 resulted in the highest grape yield, producing 14.25 and 8.94 kg vine-1 at Madhampatti and Kalampalayam, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural enemies were present in clothianidin 50 WDG plots and their activity remained unaffected.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two separate experiments were conducted in the field to examine the effectiveness of clothianidin 50 WDG against thrips and mealybugs that were infesting grapevines”
e7“Throughout the clothianidin 50 WDG treatment plots, the presence of natural enemies was noted and their activity remained unaffected”
The same questions in other papers
clothianidin · pest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.