Abstract
Field experiments on the efficacy of novel insecticide molecules and neem products to grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood were conducted in Bijapur and Bagalkot district for two seasons during 2013-14. Among twelve treatments, fipronil 5% SC @ 1.0 ml/l, imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/l were significantly superior to other treatments with more than 87 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control. The next best treatments were emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 0.2 g/l, spinosad 45% SC @ 0.25 ml/l, thiomethoxam 25% WG @ 0.25 g/l recorded more than 73 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control. Clothianidin 50% WDG @ 0.2 g/l, dimethoate 30% EC @ 1.0 ml/l, lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC @ 0.5 ml/l and acephate 75% SP @ 0.5 g/l recorded more than 48 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control. Botanicals such as azadirachtin 1500 ppm @ 3.0 ml/l and Neem Seed Kernel Extract @ 5 per cent @ 5.0 ml/l were less effective than insecticides. The results of the two season trials revealed that all the insecticides were harmful to the population of thrips than botanicals. In addition to reduction in thrips population, imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/l recorded highest marketable fruit yield (41.63 t/ha) and maximum net return of Rs. 5,06,982 per hectare.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 87% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“fipronil 5% SC @ 1.0 ml/l, imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/l were significantly superior to other treatments with more than 87 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 87% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“fipronil 5% SC @ 1.0 ml/l, imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/l were significantly superior to other treatments with more than 87 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 73% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 0.2 g/l, spinosad 45% SC @ 0.25 ml/l, thiomethoxam 25% WG @ 0.25 g/l recorded more than 73 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 73% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 0.2 g/l, spinosad 45% SC @ 0.25 ml/l, thiomethoxam 25% WG @ 0.25 g/l recorded more than 73 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 73% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 0.2 g/l, spinosad 45% SC @ 0.25 ml/l, thiomethoxam 25% WG @ 0.25 g/l recorded more than 73 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 48% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“Clothianidin 50% WDG @ 0.2 g/l, dimethoate 30% EC @ 1.0 ml/l, lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC @ 0.5 ml/l and acephate 75% SP @ 0.5 g/l recorded more than 48 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 48% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“Clothianidin 50% WDG @ 0.2 g/l, dimethoate 30% EC @ 1.0 ml/l, lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC @ 0.5 ml/l and acephate 75% SP @ 0.5 g/l recorded more than 48 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 48% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“Clothianidin 50% WDG @ 0.2 g/l, dimethoate 30% EC @ 1.0 ml/l, lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC @ 0.5 ml/l and acephate 75% SP @ 0.5 g/l recorded more than 48 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced grape thrips damage by more than 48% relative to untreated control.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“Clothianidin 50% WDG @ 0.2 g/l, dimethoate 30% EC @ 1.0 ml/l, lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC @ 0.5 ml/l and acephate 75% SP @ 0.5 g/l recorded more than 48 per cent reduction of thrips damage over untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
The botanical treatment was less effective against grape thrips than insecticides.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“Botanicals such as azadirachtin 1500 ppm @ 3.0 ml/l and Neem Seed Kernel Extract @ 5 per cent @ 5.0 ml/l were less effective than insecticides.”
Claim · model-written summary
The botanical treatment was less effective against grape thrips than insecticides.
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“grape thrips, Scirtohrips dorsalis Hood”
e1“Botanicals such as azadirachtin 1500 ppm @ 3.0 ml/l and Neem Seed Kernel Extract @ 5 per cent @ 5.0 ml/l were less effective than insecticides.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid produced the highest marketable fruit yield of 41.63 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.t0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/le0
- Outcome
- marketable fruit yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 41.63 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/l recorded highest marketable fruit yield (41.63 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid produced the maximum net return of Rs. 5,06,982 per hectare.
- Taxon
- Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.t0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/le0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs. 5,06,982 per hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Grapes, Vitis vinifera L.”
e0“imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.3 ml/l recorded highest marketable fruit yield (41.63 t/ha) and maximum net return of Rs. 5,06,982 per hectare”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · pest · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
dimethoate · pest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
clothianidin · pest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
emamectin benzoate · pest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fipronil · pest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
spinosad · pest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
imidacloprid · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
imidacloprid · yield · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.