Paper · 2020 · Insects

Persistence of a Yeast-Based (Hanseniaspora uvarum) Attract-and-Kill Formulation against Drosophila suzukii on Grape Leaves

Flavia Bianchi; Urban Spitaler; Irene Castellan; et al.

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The production of phagostimulant and attractive volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by yeasts can be exploited to improve the efficacy of attract-and-kill formulations against the spotted wing drosophila (SWD). This study evaluated the persistence over one week of a yeast-based formulation under greenhouse conditions. Potted grape plants were treated with: (i) potato dextrose broth (PDB), (ii) PDB containing spinosad (PDB + S), and (iii) H. uvarum fermentation broth grown on PDB containing spinosad (H. u. + S). Laboratory trials were performed to determine the survival and the oviposition rate of SWD after exposure to treated leaves. Ion-exchange chromatography was performed to measure carbohydrates, sugar alcohols, and organic acids on leaf surfaces, while amino acids were assessed through liquid chromatography–mass-spectrometry. Additionally, the VOCs released by plants treated with H.uvarum were collected via closed-loop-stripping analysis and compared to those emitted by untreated leaves. A higher mortality was observed for adult SWDs in contact with H. uvarum containing spinosad compared to PDB containing spinosad. Generally, a decrease in the amounts of non-volatile compounds was observed over time, though numerous nutrients were still present one week after treatment. The application of the yeast-based formulation induced the emission of VOCs by the treated leaves. The concentration of 2-phenylethanol, one of the main VOCs emitted by yeasts, decreased over time. These findings describe the presence of potential phagostimulants and compounds attractive to SWD in a yeast-based attract-and-kill formulation and demonstrate the efficacy of the formulation over one week.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeast plus spinosad formulation produced higher SWD adult mortality than spinosad broth.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
H. uvarum containing spinosade0
Interactor
SWDse0pest
Second interactor
H. uvarumHanseniaspora uvarume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mortality was observed for adult SWDse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
PDB containing spinosade0

Verbatim

e0

“A higher mortality was observed for adult SWDs in contact with H. uvarum containing spinosad compared to PDB containing spinosad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonvolatile compounds on treated leaves decreased over time.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
amounts of non-volatile compoundse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
over timee0

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in the amounts of non-volatile compounds was observed over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Numerous nutrients persisted one week after treatment.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
numerous nutrients were still presente0
Qualifier
one week after treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“numerous nutrients were still present one week after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeast formulation induced VOC emission from grape leaves.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
yeast-based formulatione0
Outcome
emission of VOCs by the treated leavese0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the yeast-based formulation induced the emission of VOCs by the treated leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2-phenylethanol concentration decreased over time.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
concentration of 2-phenylethanole0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
over timee0

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of 2-phenylethanol, one of the main VOCs emitted by yeasts, decreased over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–123 · show in text ↑

spinosad · pest · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.