Paper · 2023 · Bangladesh Journal of Botany

Impact of varying germination periods on the nutritional quality and protein availability of four legumes

Reema Devi; Veenu Sangwan; Darshan Punia

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To improve the quality and digestibility of legumes, and to examine effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes namely green gram, chickpea, lentil and moth bean the present study was undertaken. It was found that the protein content and protein digestibility of legumes increased by 4.87 to 42.79 and 3.48 to 19.77 per cent, respectively depending on the type of legume, and length of germination. The highest per cent increase in protein content was found in chickpea (42.79%) germinated for 18 hrs. Maximum increase in in-vitro protein digestibility (19.77 %) was noticed in moth bean, ranging from 5.31 to 19.77 per cent at 6, 12 and 18 hrs of germination. Highest enhancement in protein value was observed in legumes which were germinated for 18 hrs. In comparison to raw, a significant reduction was noted in the ash content of all types of germinated legumes and in terms of per cent, the decrease varied from 2.98 to 8.46. Moisture and crude fibre content increased significantly where fat content was decreased in all legumes. Processed legumes can serve as a functional food for augmenting the nutritional status of vulnerable sections of society. Bangladesh J. Bot. 52(3): 837-843, 20-23 (September)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content of legumes increased by 4.87 to 42.79% with germination.

Taxon
legumese1
Treatment
germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs)e0
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.87 to 42.79e1
Qualifier
depending on the type of legume, and length of germinatione1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“the protein content and protein digestibility of legumes increased by 4.87 to 42.79 and 3.48 to 19.77 per cent, respectively depending on the type of legume, and length of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein digestibility of legumes increased by 3.48 to 19.77% with germination.

Taxon
legumese1
Treatment
germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs)e0
Outcome
protein digestibilitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.48 to 19.77e1
Qualifier
depending on the type of legume, and length of germinatione1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“the protein content and protein digestibility of legumes increased by 4.87 to 42.79 and 3.48 to 19.77 per cent, respectively depending on the type of legume, and length of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea germinated for 18 hrs showed the highest protein content increase, 42.79%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
germinated for 18 hrse2
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
highest per cent increasee2
Value
42.79%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest per cent increase in protein content was found in chickpea (42.79%) germinated for 18 hrs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth bean showed the maximum increase in in-vitro protein digestibility, 19.77%, across germination periods.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliae3
Treatment
germinatione3
Outcome
in-vitro protein digestibilitye3
Direction
Maximum increasee3
Value
19.77 %e3
Qualifier
ranging from 5.31 to 19.77 per cent at 6, 12 and 18 hrs of germinatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum increase in in-vitro protein digestibility (19.77 %) was noticed in moth bean, ranging from 5.31 to 19.77 per cent at 6, 12 and 18 hrs of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legumes germinated for 18 hrs showed the highest enhancement in protein value.

Taxon
legumese4
Treatment
germinated for 18 hrse4
Outcome
protein valuee4
Direction
Highest enhancemente4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest enhancement in protein value was observed in legumes which were germinated for 18 hrs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ash content of all germinated legumes was significantly reduced compared with raw legumes, by 2.98 to 8.46%.

Taxon
all types of germinated legumese5
Treatment
germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs)e0
Outcome
ash contente5
Direction
significant reductione5
Value
2.98 to 8.46e5
Comparator
rawe5

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e5

“In comparison to raw, a significant reduction was noted in the ash content of all types of germinated legumes and in terms of per cent, the decrease varied from 2.98 to 8.46”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture and crude fibre content of legumes increased significantly with germination.

Taxon
legumese6
Treatment
germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs)e0
Outcome
Moisture and crude fibre contente6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“Moisture and crude fibre content increased significantly where fat content was decreased in all legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fat content of legumes decreased with germination in all legumes.

Taxon
legumese6
Treatment
germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs)e0
Outcome
fat contente6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effects of varying germination periods (6, 12 and 18 hrs) on the protein quantity, digestibility, ash, moisture, fibre and fat content of locally available legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“Moisture and crude fibre content increased significantly where fat content was decreased in all legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1154 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Processed legumes can serve as a functional food to improve nutritional status of vulnerable groups.

Taxon
legumese7
Outcome
functional foode7

Verbatim

e7

“Processed legumes can serve as a functional food for augmenting the nutritional status of vulnerable sections of society”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1276 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

processing · quality: protein · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.