Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Nanoparticles on the Storability of Onion (Allium cepa L.) Seeds under Ambient Condition

Akula Abhilash; Abhinav Dayal; Neha Thomas; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) are considered a bio safe material for organisms. Earlier studies have demonstrated the potential of ZnO-NPs for stimulation of seed germination and plant growth as disease suppression and plant protection by virtue of their antimicrobial activity. Zinc oxide is an inorganic compound it appears in white powder. (ZnO) have a potential application as a bacteriostatic agent and can be used to control the spread and infection of variety of pathogens. These results could indicate that a low zincs concentration in seeds has an important physiological role during seed germination and early seedling growth. Zinc is a constituent of an enzyme influencing the secretion of indole acetic acid (IAA), which is a phytohormone (auxin) which significantly regulates plant growth by increasing the level of IAA, zinc gives a positive response in seed germination The lab experiment was conducted on Onion seed storage using ZnO Nano-particles under ambient conditions for 3 months at Seed testing laboratory, Department of genetics and plant breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, (U.P.). The present investigation was carried out, in different concentrations of ZnO Nano particle (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140) ppm along with control (untreated) and stored in two types of packaging materials aluminium foil pouch(P1) and tin container (P2), and onion seed variety is Pusa round. The Lab experiment was conducted in factorial CRD with 4 Replications. The Observations recorded on the storage containers of the onion seedling on physiological and biochemical parameters. The results of lab experiment revealed that Aluminium foil pouch (P1) packaging material is better in germination percent, speed of germination, first count, root length, shoot length, seedling length, fresh weight, dry weight, vigour index, seed density, dehydrogenase activity, catalase activity and exhibited moisture percent and electrical conductivity as compared to tin container at end of 3 months storage. Seeds are treated with ZnO @50 ppm (T5) for 2 hours soaking in distilled water, exhibits the better results in seed quality parameters. As compared to control followed by ZnO @70ppm (T7) at the end of 3 months of storage. The study concluded that the seed germination and seedling length is increased in lower concentrations, however showed decreased in higher concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium foil packaging gave better germination, germination speed and first count than tin after three months.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
Aluminium foil pouch (P1)e0
Outcome
germination percent, speed of germination, first counte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
tin containere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminium foil pouch (P1) packaging material is better in germination percent, speed of germination, first count, root length, shoot length, seedling length, fresh weight, dry weight, vigour index, seed density, dehydrogenase activity, catalase activity and exhibited moisture percent and electrical conductivity as compared to tin container at end of 3 months storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–2092 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium foil packaging gave better root, shoot and seedling length than tin.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Aluminium foil pouch (P1)e0
Outcome
root length, shoot length, seedling lengthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
tin containere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminium foil pouch (P1) packaging material is better in germination percent, speed of germination, first count, root length, shoot length, seedling length, fresh weight, dry weight, vigour index, seed density, dehydrogenase activity, catalase activity and exhibited moisture percent and electrical conductivity as compared to tin container at end of 3 months storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–2092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium foil packaging gave better fresh weight, dry weight and vigour index than tin.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Aluminium foil pouch (P1)e0
Outcome
fresh weight, dry weight, vigour indexe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
tin containere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminium foil pouch (P1) packaging material is better in germination percent, speed of germination, first count, root length, shoot length, seedling length, fresh weight, dry weight, vigour index, seed density, dehydrogenase activity, catalase activity and exhibited moisture percent and electrical conductivity as compared to tin container at end of 3 months storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–2092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium foil packaging gave better seed density, dehydrogenase and catalase activity than tin.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Aluminium foil pouch (P1)e0
Outcome
seed density, dehydrogenase activity, catalase activitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
tin containere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminium foil pouch (P1) packaging material is better in germination percent, speed of germination, first count, root length, shoot length, seedling length, fresh weight, dry weight, vigour index, seed density, dehydrogenase activity, catalase activity and exhibited moisture percent and electrical conductivity as compared to tin container at end of 3 months storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–2092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium foil packaging exhibited moisture percentage and electrical conductivity relative to tin, with direction unspecified.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Aluminium foil pouch (P1)e1
Outcome
moisture percent and electrical conductivitye0
Comparator
tin containere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exhibited moisture percent and electrical conductivity as compared to tin container at end of 3 months storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1981–2092 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aluminium foil pouch (P1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO at 50 ppm for two hours gave better seed quality than untreated control at three months.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
ZnO @50 ppm (T5) for 2 hours soaking in distilled watere0
Outcome
seed quality parameterse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds are treated with ZnO @50 ppm (T5) for 2 hours soaking in distilled water, exhibits the better results in seed quality parameters. As compared to control followed by ZnO @70ppm (T7) at the end of 3 months of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO at 70 ppm ranked after 50 ppm for seed quality at three months.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
ZnO @70ppm (T7)e0
Outcome
seed quality parameterse1
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to control followed by ZnO @70ppm (T7) at the end of 3 months of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2229–2314 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2204–2227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low ZnO concentrations increased seed germination and seedling length.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
lower concentrationse0
Outcome
seed germination and seedling lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed germination and seedling length is increased in lower concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2340–2417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High ZnO concentrations decreased seed germination and seedling length.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
higher concentratione0
Outcome
seed germination and seedling lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed germination and seedling length is increased in lower concentrations, however showed decreased in higher concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2340–2468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: grain · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.