Paper · 2023 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Morphophysiological Changes Of Mungbean Under Different Water Regimes

A Nazran; JU Ahmed; AJMS Karim; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought stress can severely affect crop growth and productivity by altering several physiological processes. This experiment was carried out to explore the drought tolerance ability of four mungbean varieties based on their water relation and performance of some growth parameters. The experiment was conducted in pot at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur from 27th March to 15th May 2017, under a semi-controlled (vinylhouse) condition. Three different water regimes 50 to 60% field capacity (FC), 70 to 80% FC, 90 to100% FC and four mungbean varieties namely BARI Mung-5, BARI Mung-6, BU mug 2, BU mug 4 were used as treatment variable. Among the three water regimes, 50%-60% FC was considered as the severe drought stress. Results indicated significant variations in different traits of both water and growth parameters of the varieties under severe drought stress (50%-60% FC). Among the four mungbean varieties BARI Mung-6 showed superior performance with higher xylem exudation, chlorophyll content, shoot dry matter and lower water uptake capacity at 50%-60% FC (severe drought stress) whereas BU mug 2 showed the lowest performance. Results of this experiment conclude that BARI Mung-6 can be considered as a more water stress tolerant variety than the other three and recommended for cultivation under water limited conditions. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 47(3): 257-267, September 2022

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI Mung-6 showed higher xylem exudation, chlorophyll content and shoot dry matter under severe drought stress.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Material
BARI Mung-6e0
Treatment
severe drought stresse1
Outcome
xylem exudation, chlorophyll content, shoot dry mattere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“BARI Mung-6 showed superior performance with higher xylem exudation, chlorophyll content, shoot dry matter and lower water uptake capacity at 50%-60% FC (severe drought stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“50%-60% FC was considered as the severe drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI Mung-6 had lower water uptake capacity under severe drought stress.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Material
BARI Mung-6e0
Treatment
severe drought stresse0
Outcome
water uptake capacitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“BARI Mung-6 showed superior performance with higher xylem exudation, chlorophyll content, shoot dry matter and lower water uptake capacity at 50%-60% FC (severe drought stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BU mug 2 showed the lowest performance under severe drought stress.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Material
BU mug 2e0
Treatment
severe drought stresse1
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“BARI Mung-6 showed superior performance with higher xylem exudation, chlorophyll content, shoot dry matter and lower water uptake capacity at 50%-60% FC (severe drought stress) whereas BU mug 2 showed the lowest performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1180 · show in text ↑
e1

“50%-60% FC was considered as the severe drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant variations among the four mungbean varieties were found in water and growth traits under severe drought stress.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
severe drought stresse2
Outcome
different traits of both water and growth parameterse2
Direction
significant variationse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results indicated significant variations in different traits of both water and growth parameters of the varieties under severe drought stress (50%-60% FC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–921 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

BARI Mung-6 is more water-stress tolerant than the other three varieties and is recommended for cultivation under water-limited conditions.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Material
BARI Mung-6e3
Outcome
cultivation under water limited conditionse3
Qualifier
more water stress tolerant variety than the other threee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑
e3

“BARI Mung-6 can be considered as a more water stress tolerant variety than the other three and recommended for cultivation under water limited conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1376 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.