Paper · 2023 · Sustainability

Potential of Reinoculation Using R. tropici Applied under Cover to Increase Bean Yield

Amanda E. Lourenço; Itamar R. Teixeira; Ednaldo C. Rocha; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The common bean is known to require nitrogen, with mineral fertilizer being the main form of supply to the plants. However, more efficient inoculants containing strains of Rhizobium tropici that are potentially more efficient in fixing atmospheric N2 could replace the use of nitrogen fertilizers as long as some of the existing challenges in the application methodology are overcome (for example, ensuring the existence of active nodules in the most demanding crop phases: flowering and grain filling). This study aimed to verify the responses of common bean plants subjected to reinoculation using Rhizobium tropici in topdressing applied at different stages in a greenhouse and in a field between March and April 2020 and in the spring–summer harvest of 2020/2021, respectively. A randomized block design was used, along with four replications: T1 = uninoculated control; T2 = inoculation via seed (VS); T3 = VS + reinoculation at the V4 stage; T4 = VS + reinoculation at the R5 stage; T5 = VS + reinoculation at the R6 stage; T6 = VS + reinoculation at the V4 and R5 stages; T7 = VS + reinoculation at the V4 and R6 stages; T8 = VS + reinoculation at the R5 and R6 stages; T9 = VS + reinoculation at the V4, R5, and R6 stages; and T10 = mineral nitrogen fertilization. Nodulation and morphological variables were evaluated at the R7 stage, and agronomic variables were evaluated at the R9 stage at harvest. The use of reinoculation, in addition to inoculation, positively influenced the bean nodulation process. The morphological characteristics of the plants showed good development with the supply of N (carried out via inoculation and reinoculation), equivalent to the development that could be achieved via the addition of a mineral nitrogen fertilizer. Reinoculation from the R5 to R7 stages proved ineffective in supplying N to the common bean crop. Inoculation in the seed associated with reinoculation in coverage at the V4 stage provided higher yields (3.271 kg ha−1), reinforcing the potential for mineral nitrogen fertilizers to be replaced. The use of the seed inoculation technique with subsequent reinoculation under cover can completely replace the use of nitrogenous mineral fertilizers in fertilizing bean plants, making the cultivation of this fabacea more sustainable in terms of the associated costs and environmental problems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reinoculation improved bean nodulation.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
reinoculation, in addition to inoculatione0
Outcome
bean nodulation processe0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of reinoculation, in addition to inoculation, positively influenced the bean nodulation process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supplied through inoculation and reinoculation supported growth equivalent to mineral nitrogen fertilizer.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
inoculation and reinoculatione0
Outcome
morphological characteristicse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
mineral nitrogen fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“The morphological characteristics of the plants showed good development with the supply of N (carried out via inoculation and reinoculation), equivalent to the development that could be achieved via the addition of a mineral nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reinoculation from R5 to R7 was ineffective in supplying nitrogen.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Reinoculation from the R5 to R7 stagese0
Outcome
supplying Ne0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reinoculation from the R5 to R7 stages proved ineffective in supplying N to the common bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation plus V4 reinoculation produced higher bean yield of 3.271 kg ha−1.

Taxon
Beant0
Treatment
Inoculation in the seed associated with reinoculation in coverage at the V4 stagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.271 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation in the seed associated with reinoculation in coverage at the V4 stage provided higher yields (3.271 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–1980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that seed inoculation plus reinoculation under cover can replace mineral nitrogen fertilizer in bean production.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
seed inoculation technique with subsequent reinoculation under covere0
Outcome
completely replace the use of nitrogenous mineral fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the seed inoculation technique with subsequent reinoculation under cover can completely replace the use of nitrogenous mineral fertilizers in fertilizing bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2233 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.