Paper · 2023 · Kufa Journal for Agricultural Sciences

Detection of post-harvest insecticide Flash 10% EC residues in wheat seeds and soil after its degradation by the UV-C

Adeeb Al-Shafiee; Jamal H. Kadhim

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to test the effect of the physical factor (UV-C) in degrading of insecticide Flash residue in wheat seeds and the soil post-harvest. As for the field experiments with regard to Flash residual in the soil, the results showed that the highest concentration of the insecticide was 3.10 ppm in the seeds produced from plants treated with Flash only, while the lowest concentration (below the detectable level) was in the wheat seeds from plants sprayed with UV-C treated Flash. As for the residual in the soil, the highest active compound concentration was 12.50 ppm appeared in the uncultivated soil treated with Flash untreated, compared to the lowest residual concentration (0.00) ppm was in soil planted with wheat plants treated with UV-C treated Flash. Findings also showed that the best exposure period to the UV-C was 20mn

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds from plants treated with Flash alone contained the highest residue, 3.10 ppm.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
Flash onlye0
Outcome
concentration of the insecticidee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.10 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest concentration of the insecticide was 3.10 ppm in the seeds produced from plants treated with Flash only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–361 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds from plants sprayed with UV-C treated Flash had residues below detection.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
UV-C treated Flashe0
Outcome
concentratione0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
below the detectable levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest concentration (below the detectable level) was in the wheat seeds from plants sprayed with UV-C treated Flash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated Flash left the highest soil active compound concentration, 12.50 ppm, in uncultivated soil.

Treatment
Flash untreatede0
Outcome
active compound concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.50 ppme0
Setting
uncultivated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest active compound concentration was 12.50 ppm appeared in the uncultivated soil treated with Flash untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat planted soil treated with UV-C treated Flash had the lowest soil residue, 0.00 ppm.

Treatment
UV-C treated Flashe0
Outcome
residual concentratione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.00) ppme0
Setting
soil planted with wheat plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest residual concentration (0.00) ppm was in soil planted with wheat plants treated with UV-C treated Flash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–770 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best UV-C exposure period was 20mn.

Treatment
UV-Ce0
Outcome
best exposure periode0
Value
20mne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best exposure period to the UV-C was 20mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑

fluorescein bis-arsenide · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.