Paper · 2023 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Impact of Vine Water Status on 3-Alkyl-2-methoxypyrazine Content and Function Verification of VvOMT2/VvOMT3 Genes Associated with 3-Alkyl-2-methoxypyrazine Accumulation in “Marselan” Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)

Dongmei Li; Yanxia Zhang; Kangqi Geng; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

3-Alkyl-2-methoxypyrazines (MPs) could be considered as off-flavor for red wine if the concentration exceeds a certain threshold. It is unknown whether the vine water status has an influence on MP metabolism in grape berries and, therefore, in wines. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vine water status on MP content and on the expression level of VvOMTs; moreover, the exact functions of VvOMT2/3 were investigated. In this study, the grapevines were subjected over two years (2020 and 2021) to different levels of water constraints and the treatments were (i) light water constraint (LW); (ii) moderate water constraint (MW); and (iii) severe water constraint (SW) in comparison with well-irrigated vines used as control (CK). The results showed that six MPs, including ETMP, MEMP, MOMP, SBMP, IPMP, and IBMP, were negatively and significantly affected by water constraints. Meanwhile, the levels of VvOMT1, VvOMT2, VvOMT3, and VvOMT4 were 0.17-fold, 0.13-fold, 0.35-fold, and 0.75-fold, respectively, at 40 DAA or 60 DAA under MW treatment relative to CK in 2020. In 2021, the trend was similar to that in 2020. When VvOMT2 and VvOMT3 genes were transiently overexpressed in grape berries and callus, both their expression level and protein level were induced; in addition, IPMP, SBMP, and IBMP contents were significantly increased. Moreover, heterologous expression of VvOMT3 in tomato led to IPMP, SBMP, and IBMP accumulation, whereas VvOMT2 could only promote the accumulation of IPMP. Altogether, moderate water constraint not only improved the quality of “Marselan” grape berries but also reduced the MP content per berry. This study showed for the first time, according to our knowledge, the effect of vine water constraint on the metabolism of MPs by way of allowing the reduction of the precursors of this aromatic compound, which could be perceived as an off-flavor impacting negatively wine aromatic profiles with notes of asparagus and green pepper.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six methoxypyrazines ETMP, MEMP and MOMP were negatively and significantly affected by water constraints.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
water constraintse0
Outcome
ETMP, MEMP, MOMPe0
Direction
negativelye0
Comparator
well-irrigated vinese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e0

“six MPs, including ETMP, MEMP, MOMP, SBMP, IPMP, and IBMP, were negatively and significantly affected by water constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison with well-irrigated vines used as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six methoxypyrazines SBMP, IPMP and IBMP were negatively and significantly affected by water constraints.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
water constraintse0
Outcome
SBMP, IPMP, and IBMPe0
Direction
negativelye0
Comparator
well-irrigated vinese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e0

“six MPs, including ETMP, MEMP, MOMP, SBMP, IPMP, and IBMP, were negatively and significantly affected by water constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison with well-irrigated vines used as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water constraint, VvOMT1 level was 0.17-fold of the control at 40 or 60 DAA in 2020.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
40 DAA or 60 DAAe2
Treatment
MW treatmente2
Gene
VvOMT1e2
Outcome
levelse2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
0.17-folde2
Comparator
CKe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“the levels of VvOMT1, VvOMT2, VvOMT3, and VvOMT4 were 0.17-fold, 0.13-fold, 0.35-fold, and 0.75-fold, respectively, at 40 DAA or 60 DAA under MW treatment relative to CK in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water constraint, VvOMT2 level was 0.13-fold of the control at 40 or 60 DAA in 2020.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
40 DAA or 60 DAAe2
Treatment
MW treatmente2
Gene
VvOMT2e2
Outcome
levelse2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
0.13-folde2
Comparator
CKe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“the levels of VvOMT1, VvOMT2, VvOMT3, and VvOMT4 were 0.17-fold, 0.13-fold, 0.35-fold, and 0.75-fold, respectively, at 40 DAA or 60 DAA under MW treatment relative to CK in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water constraint, VvOMT3 level was 0.35-fold of the control at 40 or 60 DAA in 2020.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
40 DAA or 60 DAAe2
Treatment
MW treatmente2
Gene
VvOMT3e2
Outcome
levelse2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
0.35-folde2
Comparator
CKe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“the levels of VvOMT1, VvOMT2, VvOMT3, and VvOMT4 were 0.17-fold, 0.13-fold, 0.35-fold, and 0.75-fold, respectively, at 40 DAA or 60 DAA under MW treatment relative to CK in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water constraint, VvOMT4 level was 0.75-fold of the control at 40 or 60 DAA in 2020.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
40 DAA or 60 DAAe2
Treatment
MW treatmente2
Gene
VvOMT4e2
Outcome
levelse2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
0.75-folde2
Comparator
CKe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“the levels of VvOMT1, VvOMT2, VvOMT3, and VvOMT4 were 0.17-fold, 0.13-fold, 0.35-fold, and 0.75-fold, respectively, at 40 DAA or 60 DAA under MW treatment relative to CK in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1074 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2021 trend in VvOMT levels was similar to that of 2020.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
trende3
Qualifier
similar to that in 2020e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2021, the trend was similar to that in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient overexpression of VvOMT2 and VvOMT3 in grape berries and callus induced their expression and protein levels.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
grape berries and calluse4
Treatment
transiently overexpressede4
Gene
VvOMT2 and VvOMT3e4
Outcome
expression level and protein levele4
Direction
inducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e4

“When VvOMT2 and VvOMT3 genes were transiently overexpressed in grape berries and callus, both their expression level and protein level were induced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient overexpression of VvOMT2 and VvOMT3 significantly increased IPMP, SBMP and IBMP contents.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
transiently overexpressede4
Gene
VvOMT2 and VvOMT3e4
Outcome
IPMP, SBMP, and IBMP contentse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e4

“When VvOMT2 and VvOMT3 genes were transiently overexpressed in grape berries and callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1211 · show in text ↑
e5

“IPMP, SBMP, and IBMP contents were significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterologous expression of VvOMT3 in tomato led to IPMP, SBMP and IBMP accumulation.

Treatment
heterologous expressione6
Gene
VvOMT3e6
Outcome
IPMP, SBMP, and IBMP accumulatione6
Direction
increaseinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“heterologous expression of VvOMT3 in tomato led to IPMP, SBMP, and IBMP accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VvOMT2 could only promote IPMP accumulation in tomato.

Treatment
VvOMT2e7
Gene
VvOMT2e7
Outcome
accumulation of IPMPe7
Direction
promotee7
Qualifier
could onlye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“heterologous expression of VvOMT3 in tomato led to IPMP, SBMP, and IBMP accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1440 · show in text ↑
e7

“VvOMT2 could only promote the accumulation of IPMP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water constraint improved the quality of Marselan grape berries compared with well-irrigated vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Marselane7
Organ / stage
grape berriese7
Treatment
moderate water constrainte7
Outcome
qualitye7
Direction
improvede7
Comparator
well-irrigated vinese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison with well-irrigated vines used as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–736 · show in text ↑
e7

“moderate water constraint not only improved the quality of “Marselan” grape berries but also reduced the MP content per berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water constraint reduced the MP content per berry compared with well-irrigated vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Marselane7
Organ / stage
berrye7
Treatment
moderate water constrainte7
Outcome
MP content per berrye7
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
well-irrigated vinese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berries (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison with well-irrigated vines used as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–736 · show in text ↑
e7

“moderate water constraint not only improved the quality of “Marselan” grape berries but also reduced the MP content per berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1639 · show in text ↑

overexpression · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.