Paper · 2023 · Plants

Effects of Plant Regulators on the Seed Germination and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Cotton under Compound Salt Stress

Zhiduo Dong; Jian Huang; Tong Qi; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity stress significantly hampers cotton seed germination and seedling growth. Employing plant growth regulators stands out as an effective strategy to mitigate salt stress. In this study, we assessed the impact of varying concentrations of natural composite salt conditions (0%, 0.6%, and 1.2%) on cotton seed germination, seedling growth, and physiology. Additionally, we explored the effects of compound sodium nitrophenolate (CSN: 2 mg·L−1 and 10 mg·L−1), 24-epibrassinolide (EBR: 0.02 mg·L−1 and 0.1 mg·L−1), and gibberellic acid (GA: 60 mg·L−1 and 300 mg·L−1), against a control (CK: distilled water) group. The results indicate that with an increase in the composite salt concentration, the germination potential (GP) and germination rate (GR) of cotton seeds gradually decrease. Simultaneously, the fresh weight and root vitality of seedlings also correspondingly decrease, while the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation increases. Under high-salt (1.2%) conditions, soaking treatments with CSN and EBR significantly enhance both GP (45–59% and 55–64%) and GR (30–33% and 39–36%) compared to the CK. However, the GA treatment does not increase the GP and GR of cotton. Moreover, under high-salt (1.2%) conditions, CSN and EBR treatments result in the increased activities of superoxide dismutase (56–66% and 71–80%), peroxidase (20–24% and 37–51%), and catalase (26–32% and 35–46%). Consequently, cotton exhibits a relatively good tolerance to natural composite salts. Soaking treatments with CSN and EBR effectively improve cotton germination by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities, thereby strengthening cotton’s tolerance to salt stress. These findings offer new insights for enhancing the salt tolerance of cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt decreased cotton germination potential and rate.

Treatment
composite salt concentratione0
Outcome
germination potential (GP) and germination rate (GR)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with an increase in the composite salt concentration, the germination potential (GP) and germination rate (GR) of cotton seeds gradually decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–789 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt decreased seedling fresh weight and root vitality and increased membrane lipid peroxidation.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Outcome
fresh weight and root vitality of seedlingse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fresh weight and root vitality of seedlings also correspondingly decrease, while the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSN and EBR significantly enhanced cotton germination potential and rate under high salt.

Treatment
soaking treatments with CSN and EBRe0
Outcome
GPe0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
45–59%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under high-salt (1.2%) conditions, soaking treatments with CSN and EBR significantly enhance both GP (45–59% and 55–64%) and GR (30–33% and 39–36%) compared to the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA did not increase cotton germination potential or rate.

Treatment
GA treatmente0
Outcome
GP and GRe0
Direction
does not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the GA treatment does not increase the GP and GR of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSN and EBR increased antioxidant enzyme activities under high salt.

Treatment
CSN and EBR treatmentse0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
56–66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under high-salt (1.2%) conditions, CSN and EBR treatments result in the increased activities of superoxide dismutase (56–66% and 71–80%), peroxidase (20–24% and 37–51%), and catalase (26–32% and 35–46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed improved cotton germination and salt tolerance to enhanced antioxidant enzymes after CSN and EBR soaking.

Treatment
Soaking treatments with CSN and EBRe0
Outcome
cotton germinatione0
Qualifier
enhancing antioxidant enzyme activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking treatments with CSN and EBR effectively improve cotton germination by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities, thereby strengthening cotton’s tolerance to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1656 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

24-epi-brassinolide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.