Abstract
Abstract A plastic pot experiment was carried out for the agricultural season 2021-2022 in the fields of the College of Agriculture-University of Anbar and located at 30° north latitude and 43° east longitude, in order to know the role of foliar spraying of wheat plants with humic acid at concentrations of 0 mg.L −1 (H 0 ), 0.75 g.L −1 (H 1 ) and 1.5 g.L −1 (H 2 ) and the added zinc element sprayed with concentrations: 0 mg.L -1 (Zn 0 ), 60 mg.L −1 in the form of nano-zinc oxide (Zn 1 ) and 120 mg.L −1 in the form of traditional zinc oxide fertilizer (Zn 2 ). A factorial experiment was designed according to the sectors Randomized complete set (R.C.B.D) with three replications The results of the statistical analysis showed that there was a significant increase in foliar spraying with humic acid and for all concentrations, with superiority for the highest concentration, as well as when feeding with nano particles and traditional zinc, with a clear superiority of nano particle zinc in all the studied characteristics: Plant hight, leaf area, spike length, seeds yield, and zinc concentration in seeds:(61.67 cm, 24.51 dm 2 plant −1 , 12.33 cm, 8.05 gm, pot −1 , 14.00 mg kg −1 ) compared to control treatment H 0 Zn 0 :(46.00 cm, 16.13 dm, plant −1 , 8.67 cm, 6.28 gm −1 , 7.80 mg kg −1 ) respectively Start your abstract here…
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid spraying significantly increased wheat traits, with the highest concentration superior.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- foliar spraying with humic acide0
- Outcome
- all concentrationse0
- Direction
- significant increasee0
- Comparator
- 0 mg.L −1 (H 0 )e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was a significant increase in foliar spraying with humic acid and for all concentrations, with superiority for the highest concentration”
e1“wheat plants with humic acid at concentrations of 0 mg.L −1 (H 0 ), 0.75 g.L −1 (H 1 ) and 1.5 g.L −1 (H 2 )”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano zinc outperformed traditional zinc for the studied wheat traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- nano particle zince0
- Outcome
- Plant hight, leaf area, spike lengthe0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Comparator
- traditional zince0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when feeding with nano particles and traditional zinc, with a clear superiority of nano particle zinc in all the studied characteristics: Plant hight, leaf area, spike length, seeds yield, and zinc concentration in seeds”
e1“wheat plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Treated wheat reached 61.67 cm height versus 46.00 cm in the control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- nano particle zince2
- Outcome
- Plant highte0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 61.67 cme0
- Qualifier
- 46.00 cme0
- Comparator
- control treatment H 0 Zn 0e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant hight, leaf area, spike length, seeds yield, and zinc concentration in seeds:(61.67 cm, 24.51 dm 2 plant −1 , 12.33 cm, 8.05 gm, pot −1 , 14.00 mg kg −1 ) compared to control treatment H 0 Zn 0 :(46.00 cm, 16.13 dm, plant −1 , 8.67 cm, 6.28 gm −1 , 7.80 mg kg −1 ) respectively”
e1“wheat plants”
e2“nano particle zinc”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.