Paper · 2023 · Grain Economy of Russia

Promising photosynthetic parameters Y(II) and NPQ for predicting barley drought tolerance

Yu. A. Nemtsova; D. V. Kuznetsova; M. A. Grinberg; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The purpose of the current work was to identify photosynthetic parameters that are predictors of barley drought tolerance, determined at early stages of development, and to verify the results obtained in field conditions. The study was carried out with the barley varieties ‘Leon’, ‘Ratnik’ and ‘Foks 1’, used in mutation breeding to develop drought-resistant genotypes. Drought was modeled by stopping irrigation. Plant resistance was estimated by changes in chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv /Fm, Y(II), NPQ) and morphometric parameters (leaf length, wet and dry weight) compared to the control group with normal water supply. Under stress-free conditions, the variety ‘Leon’ demonstrated a statistically significantly lower efficiency of photosynthesis in terms of Y(II) and Fv /Fm (0.535 ± 0.005 and 0.776 ± 0.004, respectively) in comparison with other varieties (0.577 ± 0.005 and 0.788 ± 0.001 for the variety ‘Foks 1’; 0.574 ± 0.004 and 0.787 ± 0.001 for the variety ‘Ratnik’). When modeling drought, there has been established a decrease in all morphometric indicators for all varieties relative to the control, with the highest degree of inhibition for the variety ‘Ratnik’ (70.16 ± 3.88 %; 8.09 ± 0.73 %; 68.50 ± 4.42 % for leaf length, wet and dry weight, respectively) and with the lowest degree for the variety ‘Leon’ (88.06 ± 7.83 %; 26.51 ± 7.11 %; 79.32 ± 11.17 %, respectively). A decrease in the photosynthesis intensity was manifested in the suppression of Fv /Fm and Y(II) and an increase in NPQ, with the earliest changes in the parameters Y(II) and NPQ in the varieties ‘Foks 1’ and ‘Ratnik’ (on the 4 th and 5 th day, respectively), compared to the variety ‘Leon’ (on the 7 th day). In the field conditions, there has been estimated productivity of the varieties and its dependence on precipitation. A positive correlation between the difference in yield of two varieties ‘Leon’ and ‘Ratnik’, contrasting in their response to drought, and the amount of precipitation during the active vegetation period in 2014–2017 and 2022 (Pearson’s R2 = 0.77, p < 0.05) has been identified. The most sensitive parameters of photosynthesis, which can be used to predict resistance to moisture deficiency, were Y(II) and NPQ.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leon had lower Y(II) under stress-free conditions than the other barley varieties.

Material
Leone0
Outcome
Y(II)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.535 ± 0.005e0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety ‘Leon’ demonstrated a statistically significantly lower efficiency of photosynthesis in terms of Y(II) and Fv /Fm (0.535 ± 0.005 and 0.776 ± 0.004, respectively) in comparison with other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leon had lower Fv/Fm under stress-free conditions than the other varieties.

Material
Leone0
Outcome
Fv /Fme0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.776 ± 0.004e0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety ‘Leon’ demonstrated a statistically significantly lower efficiency of photosynthesis in terms of Y(II) and Fv /Fm (0.535 ± 0.005 and 0.776 ± 0.004, respectively) in comparison with other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased leaf length, wet weight, and dry weight in all barley varieties.

Treatment
droughtt0
Outcome
leaf length, wet and dry weighte1
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in all morphometric indicators for all varieties relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“morphometric parameters (leaf length, wet and dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratnik showed the greatest drought inhibition of leaf length, wet weight, and dry weight.

Material
Ratnike0
Outcome
leaf length, wet and dry weighte0
Direction
highest degree of inhibitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest degree of inhibition for the variety ‘Ratnik’ (70.16 ± 3.88 %; 8.09 ± 0.73 %; 68.50 ± 4.42 % for leaf length, wet and dry weight, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leon showed the lowest drought inhibition of leaf length, wet weight, and dry weight.

Material
Leone0
Outcome
leaf length, wet and dry weighte1
Direction
lowest degreee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest degree for the variety ‘Leon’ (88.06 ± 7.83 %; 26.51 ± 7.11 %; 79.32 ± 11.17 %, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1390 · show in text ↑
e1

“for leaf length, wet and dry weight, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought suppressed barley Fv/Fm and Y(II).

Treatment
droughtt0
Outcome
Fv /Fm and Y(II)e0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in the photosynthesis intensity was manifested in the suppression of Fv /Fm and Y(II)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased barley NPQ.

Outcome
NPQe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in NPQ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield difference between Leon and Ratnik correlated positively with vegetation-period precipitation.

Material
Leone0
Outcome
difference in yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
Pearson’s R2 = 0.77, p < 0.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive correlation between the difference in yield of two varieties ‘Leon’ and ‘Ratnik’, contrasting in their response to drought, and the amount of precipitation during the active vegetation period in 2014–2017 and 2022 (Pearson’s R2 = 0.77, p < 0.05) has been identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–2095 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Y(II) and NPQ were the most sensitive predictors of moisture-deficiency resistance.

Outcome
Y(II) and NPQe0
Direction
most sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most sensitive parameters of photosynthesis, which can be used to predict resistance to moisture deficiency, were Y(II) and NPQ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2097–2228 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 6 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

drought · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 15 positive, 90 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.