Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2018 and 2019 at the Crop Research Centre (Campus), Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, to evaluate the effect of zinc fertilization on growth, yield attributes and yield of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Among the varieties ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ showed the highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield and was at par with ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ during both the years. Variety, ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ gave about 8.8% and 9.9%, 2.6% and 2.0% higher yield than ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ and ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ during both the years. On the other hand, the rice grain yield was increased by 6.6 and 8.0% in ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ as compared to ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ during 2018 and 2019, respectively. Plant height (103.5 and 102.5 cm), leaf area index (5.12 and 4.93), days taken to maturity (144.5 and 143.9 days), effective tillers/m2 (422.9 and 414.1), grains weight/panicle (1.90 and 1.81 g) and were found better with ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’. ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ showed the lowest growth parameters, yield-attributing characters and yield during both the years. Among the zinc-management practices seedling dipping in 2% ZnSO4 + foliar spray @ 0.5% at tillering and panicle-initiation stage was found to be the best for the growth parameters, yield attributes and yield in ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’. ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ with seedling dipping in 2% ZnSO4 + foliar spray @ 0.5% at tillering and panicle-initiation stage exhibited significant increase in the growth parameters, yield-attributing characters and finally the yield, leading to enhanced productivity of basmati rice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 had the highest growth, yield attributes and yield and was at par with Pusa Basmati 1509 in both years.
Verbatim
e0“Among the varieties ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ showed the highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield and was at par with ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ during both the years.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 yielded 8.8% and 9.9% more than Pusa Basmati 1401 across the two years.
Verbatim
e0“Variety, ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ gave about 8.8% and 9.9%, 2.6% and 2.0% higher yield than ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ and ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ during both the years.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 yielded 2.6% and 2.0% more than Pusa Basmati 1509 across the two years.
Verbatim
e0“Variety, ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’ gave about 8.8% and 9.9%, 2.6% and 2.0% higher yield than ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ and ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ during both the years.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1509 grain yield exceeded Pusa Basmati 1401 by 6.6% in 2018.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Material
- ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.6e0
- Qualifier
- 2018e0
- Comparator
- ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the rice grain yield was increased by 6.6 and 8.0% in ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ as compared to ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ during 2018 and 2019, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1509 grain yield exceeded Pusa Basmati 1401 by 8.0% in 2019.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Material
- ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8.0%e0
- Qualifier
- 2019e0
- Comparator
- ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the rice grain yield was increased by 6.6 and 8.0% in ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ as compared to ‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ during 2018 and 2019, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 had better plant height, 103.5 and 102.5 cm.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height (103.5 and 102.5 cm), leaf area index (5.12 and 4.93), days taken to maturity (144.5 and 143.9 days), effective tillers/m2 (422.9 and 414.1), grains weight/panicle (1.90 and 1.81 g) and were found better with ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 had better leaf area index, 5.12 and 4.93.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height (103.5 and 102.5 cm), leaf area index (5.12 and 4.93), days taken to maturity (144.5 and 143.9 days), effective tillers/m2 (422.9 and 414.1), grains weight/panicle (1.90 and 1.81 g) and were found better with ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 had better time to maturity, 144.5 and 143.9 days.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height (103.5 and 102.5 cm), leaf area index (5.12 and 4.93), days taken to maturity (144.5 and 143.9 days), effective tillers/m2 (422.9 and 414.1), grains weight/panicle (1.90 and 1.81 g) and were found better with ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 had better effective tillers, 422.9 and 414.1 per square metre.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height (103.5 and 102.5 cm), leaf area index (5.12 and 4.93), days taken to maturity (144.5 and 143.9 days), effective tillers/m2 (422.9 and 414.1), grains weight/panicle (1.90 and 1.81 g) and were found better with ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1121 had better grain weight per panicle, 1.90 and 1.81 g.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height (103.5 and 102.5 cm), leaf area index (5.12 and 4.93), days taken to maturity (144.5 and 143.9 days), effective tillers/m2 (422.9 and 414.1), grains weight/panicle (1.90 and 1.81 g) and were found better with ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa Basmati 1401 had the lowest growth, yield components and yield in both years.
Verbatim
e0“‘Pusa Basmati 1401’ showed the lowest growth parameters, yield-attributing characters and yield during both the years.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedling dipping in 2% ZnSO4 plus foliar spray at 0.5% was best for growth, yield attributes and yield in Pusa Basmati 1121.
- Taxon
- basmati ricet0
- Material
- ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’e0
- Treatment
- seedling dipping in 2% ZnSO4 + foliar spray @ 0.5% at tillering and panicle-initiation stagee0
- Outcome
- growth parameters, yield attributes and yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“seedling dipping in 2% ZnSO4 + foliar spray @ 0.5% at tillering and panicle-initiation stage was found to be the best for the growth parameters, yield attributes and yield in ‘Pusa Basmati 1121’.”
t0“basmati rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The same zinc regime significantly increased growth, yield attributes and yield in Pusa Basmati 1509.
- Taxon
- basmati ricet0
- Material
- ‘Pusa Basmati 1509’e0
- Treatment
- seedling dipping in 2% ZnSO4 + foliar spray @ 0.5% at tillering and panicle-initiation stagee0
- Outcome
- growth parameters, yield-attributing characters and finally the yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“‘Pusa Basmati 1509’ with seedling dipping in 2% ZnSO4 + foliar spray @ 0.5% at tillering and panicle-initiation stage exhibited significant increase in the growth parameters, yield-attributing characters and finally the yield”
t0“basmati rice”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
687 papers more in this group
See all 691 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.