Abstract
An experiment conducted during 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 showed 43.4% and 43.9% reduction in cane yield due to weeds. Highest cane yield (84.6 tonneslha and 80.6 tonneslha) was recorded under weed-free con- ditions, which was at par with 3 hoeings (30, 60 and 90 days after planting) during both the years. Significant im- provement in cane yield was reported under treatments comprising herbicide spray followed by hoeing over that of herbicide spray alone. Highest net return of Rs 31,2961ha and 27,989ha was recorded in weed-free treatment during 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 respectively. However, highest benefit : cost ratio of 1:0.58 during 2001-2002 and of 1 :0.55 during 2002-2003 was observed in 3 hoeings (30, 60 and 90 days after planting).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds reduced cane yield by 43.4% in the first year.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- weedse0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 43.4%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“43.4% and 43.9% reduction in cane yield due to weeds”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds reduced cane yield by 43.9% in the second year.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- weedse0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 43.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“43.4% and 43.9% reduction in cane yield due to weeds”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed-free conditions gave the highest cane yield, 84.6 tonneslha and 80.6 tonneslha in the two years.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- weed-free con- ditionse0
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 84.6 tonneslha and 80.6 tonneslhae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Highest cane yield (84.6 tonneslha and 80.6 tonneslha) was recorded under weed-free con- ditions”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane yield with weed-free conditions was at par with three hoeings in both years.
Verbatim
e0“which was at par with 3 hoeings (30, 60 and 90 days after planting) during both the years”
t1“Highest cane yield (84.6 tonneslha and 80.6 tonneslha) was recorded under weed-free con- ditions”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide spray followed by hoeing significantly improved cane yield over herbicide spray alone.
Verbatim
e0“Significant im- provement in cane yield was reported under treatments comprising herbicide spray followed by hoeing over that of herbicide spray alone”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed-free treatment had the highest net returns of Rs 31,2961ha and 27,989ha in the two years.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- weed-free treatmente0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- Rs 31,2961ha and 27,989hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Highest net return of Rs 31,2961ha and 27,989ha was recorded in weed-free treatment during 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Three hoeings gave the highest benefit:cost ratios, 1:0.58 and 1 :0.55 in the two years.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 3 hoeings (30, 60 and 90 days after planting)e0
- Outcome
- benefit : cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1:0.58 during 2001-2002 and of 1 :0.55e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“highest benefit : cost ratio of 1:0.58 during 2001-2002 and of 1 :0.55 during 2002-2003 was observed in 3 hoeings (30, 60 and 90 days after planting)”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.