Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during the winter (rabi) seasons of 201314 and 201415 at Ludhiana, Punjab, to study the effect of nitrogen and spacing on N uptake, oil yield, protein yield and oil quality of short- statured, determinate genotypes of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun). The experiment was con- ducted in 3 replications in a split-plot design with combination of 3 genotypes (BJC 13-1, BJC 13-2, BJC 13-3) and 4 spacings (25 cm 15 cm, 30 cm 10 cm, 30 cm 15 cm, 45 cm 10 cm) in main plots and 2 doses of N (100 and 125 kg/ha) in subplots. Pooled mean data of two years revealed that different genotypes registered simi- lar seed and stover yields, N content in seed, N uptake in seed, stover as well as total, protein content and oil and protein yields. Genotypes also did not differ in fatty acid composition of oil except oleic acid, eicosenoic acid and erucic acid which were higher in BJC 13-1 compared to BJC13-3. The highest seed and stover yields were ob- tained with 25 cm 15 cm spacing. Spacing of 30 cm 15 cm resulted in significantly more N and protein content in seed and stover, N uptake by stover and total N uptake. Effect of spacing on oil content and yield and oil quality was non-significant. Application of 125 kg/ha of N resulted in significantly more N content in seed and stover, N uptake by seed, stover and total, oil yield, protein content, protein yield and improved oleic acid, linoleic acid, lino- lenic acid and decreased proportion of erucic acid in oil as compared to 100 kg/ha of N.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Different Ethiopian mustard genotypes had similar seed and stover yields.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Material
- genotypese1
- Outcome
- seed and stover yieldse1
- Direction
- simi- lare1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e1“different genotypes registered simi- lar seed and stover yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethiopian mustard genotypes did not differ in fatty acid composition of oil.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Material
- genotypese2
- Outcome
- fatty acid composition of oile2
- Direction
- did not differe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e2“Genotypes also did not differ in fatty acid composition of oil except oleic acid, eicosenoic acid and erucic acid which were higher in BJC 13-1 compared to BJC13-3”
Claim · model-written summary
Oleic acid, eicosenoic acid and erucic acid were higher in genotype BJC 13-1 than in BJC13-3.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Material
- BJC 13-1e2
- Outcome
- oleic acid, eicosenoic acid and erucic acide2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- BJC13-3e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e2“Genotypes also did not differ in fatty acid composition of oil except oleic acid, eicosenoic acid and erucic acid which were higher in BJC 13-1 compared to BJC13-3”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest seed and stover yields were obtained with 25 cm x 15 cm spacing.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- 25 cm 15 cm spacinge3
- Outcome
- seed and stover yieldse3
- Direction
- higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e3“The highest seed and stover yields were ob- tained with 25 cm 15 cm spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 30 cm x 15 cm gave significantly more N and protein content in seed and stover.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- Spacing of 30 cm 15 cme4
- Outcome
- N and protein content in seed and stovere4
- Direction
- significantly moree4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e4“Spacing of 30 cm 15 cm resulted in significantly more N and protein content in seed and stover, N uptake by stover and total N uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 30 cm x 15 cm gave significantly more N uptake by stover and total N uptake.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- Spacing of 30 cm 15 cme4
- Outcome
- N uptake by stover and total N uptakee4
- Direction
- significantly moree4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e4“Spacing of 30 cm 15 cm resulted in significantly more N and protein content in seed and stover, N uptake by stover and total N uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing had no significant effect on oil content and yield or on oil quality.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- spacinge5
- Outcome
- oil content and yield and oil qualitye5
- Direction
- non-significante5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e5“Effect of spacing on oil content and yield and oil quality was non-significant”
Claim · model-written summary
125 kg/ha of N gave significantly more N content in seed and stover than 100 kg/ha of N.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- 125 kg/ha of Ne6
- Outcome
- N content in seed and stovere6
- Direction
- significantly moree6
- Comparator
- 100 kg/ha of Ne6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e6“Application of 125 kg/ha of N resulted in significantly more N content in seed and stover, N uptake by seed, stover and total, oil yield, protein content, protein yield and improved oleic acid, linoleic acid, lino- lenic acid and decreased proportion of erucic acid in oil as compared to 100 kg/ha of N”
Claim · model-written summary
125 kg/ha of N gave significantly more N uptake by seed, stover and total than 100 kg/ha of N.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- 125 kg/ha of Ne6
- Outcome
- N uptake by seed, stover and totale6
- Direction
- significantly moree6
- Comparator
- 100 kg/ha of Ne6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e6“Application of 125 kg/ha of N resulted in significantly more N content in seed and stover, N uptake by seed, stover and total, oil yield, protein content, protein yield and improved oleic acid, linoleic acid, lino- lenic acid and decreased proportion of erucic acid in oil as compared to 100 kg/ha of N”
Claim · model-written summary
125 kg/ha of N gave significantly more oil yield, protein content and protein yield than 100 kg/ha of N.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- 125 kg/ha of Ne6
- Outcome
- oil yield, protein content, protein yielde6
- Direction
- significantly moree6
- Comparator
- 100 kg/ha of Ne6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e6“Application of 125 kg/ha of N resulted in significantly more N content in seed and stover, N uptake by seed, stover and total, oil yield, protein content, protein yield and improved oleic acid, linoleic acid, lino- lenic acid and decreased proportion of erucic acid in oil as compared to 100 kg/ha of N”
Claim · model-written summary
125 kg/ha of N improved oleic, linoleic and linolenic acid content of the oil compared with 100 kg/ha of N.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- 125 kg/ha of Ne6
- Outcome
- oleic acid, linoleic acid, lino- lenic acide6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Comparator
- 100 kg/ha of Ne6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e6“Application of 125 kg/ha of N resulted in significantly more N content in seed and stover, N uptake by seed, stover and total, oil yield, protein content, protein yield and improved oleic acid, linoleic acid, lino- lenic acid and decreased proportion of erucic acid in oil as compared to 100 kg/ha of N”
Claim · model-written summary
125 kg/ha of N decreased the proportion of erucic acid in the oil compared with 100 kg/ha of N.
- Taxon
- Ethiopian mustard
Brassica carinatat0 - Treatment
- 125 kg/ha of Ne6
- Outcome
- proportion of erucic acide6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Comparator
- 100 kg/ha of Ne6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata)”
e6“Application of 125 kg/ha of N resulted in significantly more N content in seed and stover, N uptake by seed, stover and total, oil yield, protein content, protein yield and improved oleic acid, linoleic acid, lino- lenic acid and decreased proportion of erucic acid in oil as compared to 100 kg/ha of N”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: protein · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
density · yield · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →density · quality: oil · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.