Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification. From the 2 years data, significantly higher gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and en- ergy intensity were recorded with system of rice intensification (SRI) over mechanized system of rice intensifica- tion (MSRI). Energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity recorded were significantly higher with irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW) and these were at par with saturation treatment. Nitrogen application based on leaf colour chart (LCC) recorded higher gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity in economic terms as compared to other nitrogen management practices. MSRI and SRI performed equally better with respect to benefit: cost ratio. Considerably higher gross and net returns were obtained with SRI as compared to MSRI. The labour saving was 2125% higher with MSRI than SRI. Irrigation at 3 DADPW recorded significantly higher net returns and benefit: cost ratio, which was comparable with saturation treatment. Gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio, were significantly higher with nitrogen application based on LCC, except soil test crop response based nitrogen application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
SRI gave significantly higher gross energy output, net energy and energy-use efficiency than MSRI in rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- system of rice intensification (SRI)e1
- Outcome
- gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiencye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- mechanized system of rice intensifica- tion (MSRI)e1
- Setting
- Hyderabad, Telanganae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e1“From the 2 years data, significantly higher gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and en- ergy intensity were recorded with system of rice intensification (SRI) over mechanized system of rice intensifica- tion (MSRI)”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI gave significantly higher energy productivity and energy intensity than MSRI in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- system of rice intensification (SRI)e1
- Outcome
- energy productivity and en- ergy intensitye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- mechanized system of rice intensifica- tion (MSRI)e1
- Setting
- Hyderabad, Telanganae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e1“From the 2 years data, significantly higher gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and en- ergy intensity were recorded with system of rice intensification (SRI) over mechanized system of rice intensifica- tion (MSRI)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water significantly increased energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW)e2
- Outcome
- Energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensitye2
- Direction
- highere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e2“Energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity recorded were significantly higher with irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW) and these were at par with saturation treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 3 DADPW gave energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity at par with saturation treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW)e2
- Outcome
- Energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensitye2
- Direction
- at pare2
- Comparator
- saturation treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e2“Energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity recorded were significantly higher with irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW) and these were at par with saturation treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
MSRI and SRI performed equally with respect to benefit:cost ratio in rice.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e4“MSRI and SRI performed equally better with respect to benefit: cost ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI gave considerably higher gross and net returns than MSRI in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- SRIe5
- Outcome
- gross and net returnse5
- Direction
- highere5
- Comparator
- MSRIe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e5“Considerably higher gross and net returns were obtained with SRI as compared to MSRI”
Claim · model-written summary
MSRI gave 2125% higher labour saving than SRI in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- MSRIe6
- Outcome
- labour savinge6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 2125%e6
- Comparator
- SRIe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e6“The labour saving was 2125% higher with MSRI than SRI”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 3 DADPW gave significantly higher net returns and benefit:cost ratio in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Irrigation at 3 DADPWe7
- Outcome
- net returns and benefit: cost ratioe7
- Direction
- highere7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e7“Irrigation at 3 DADPW recorded significantly higher net returns and benefit: cost ratio, which was comparable with saturation treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 3 DADPW gave net returns and benefit:cost ratio comparable with saturation treatment in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Irrigation at 3 DADPWe7
- Outcome
- net returns and benefit: cost ratioe7
- Direction
- comparablee7
- Comparator
- saturation treatmente7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e7“Irrigation at 3 DADPW recorded significantly higher net returns and benefit: cost ratio, which was comparable with saturation treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application based on LCC gave significantly higher gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio in rice, except the soil test crop response based nitrogen application.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- nitrogen application based on LCCe1
- Outcome
- Gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratioe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Qualifier
- except soil test crop response based nitrogen applicatione1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification”
e1“Gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio, were significantly higher with nitrogen application based on LCC, except soil test crop response based nitrogen application”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.